DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg

955 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
9
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 955 KB
Summary

This legal document details internal discussions and a key meeting related to the federal investigation of Epstein. It describes a June 26, 2007, meeting where Epstein's attorneys, led by Dershowitz, argued for the case to be handled by the state, an argument the USAO team found unpersuasive. Despite internal concerns about the strength of certain aspects of the case, the USAO team left the meeting intending to proceed, but the document concludes by noting that in July 2007, Acosta decided to offer Epstein a two-year state plea deal to resolve the federal investigation.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Lourie
Opined on the government's argument against Epstein, expressed concern about legal aspects, and participated in a mee...
Epstein Subject of investigation
The subject of a federal investigation regarding a network of illegal high school massage recruits. His attorneys met...
Villafaña case agent
Told OPR about her disagreement with Lourie's analysis, attended the June 26, 2007 meeting, and shared her impression...
Sloman
Attended the June 26, 2007 meeting at the Miami USAO.
Menchel
Attended the June 26, 2007 meeting, provided his perspective to OPR, and raised issues about victim credibility.
Dershowitz Epstein attorney
Led the defense team's presentation at the June 26, 2007 meeting.
Black Epstein attorney
Attended the June 26, 2007 meeting as one of Epstein's attorneys.
Lefcourt Epstein attorney
Attended the June 26, 2007 meeting as one of Epstein's attorneys. Arguments from his letter were echoed in the meeting.
Sanchez Epstein attorney
Attended the June 26, 2007 meeting as one of Epstein's attorneys.
Acosta
In July 2007, developed or adopted a two-year state plea agreement to resolve the federal investigation into Epstein.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
USAO government agency
The U.S. Attorney's Office, whose personnel met with Epstein's attorneys and were involved in the decision-making pro...
OPR government agency
The Office of Professional Responsibility, to whom Villafaña and Menchel provided information and recollections about...

Timeline (3 events)

2007-06-26
A meeting between USAO personnel and Epstein's defense team, where the defense presented their arguments for the case to be handled by the state. The USAO considered it a 'listening session'.
Miami USAO
Sloman Menchel Lourie Villafaña the case agent the West Palm Beach squad supervisor Dershowitz Black Lefcourt Sanchez
2007-06-26
A short post-meeting discussion where Lourie expressed concern about the purpose of travel issue and Menchel raised issues about victim credibility.
2007-07
Acosta developed or adopted the broad outline of a two-year state plea agreement to resolve the federal investigation into Epstein.

Locations (2)

Location Context
The location of the meeting on June 26, 2007, between USAO personnel and Epstein's attorneys.
The location of the squad supervisor who attended the June 26, 2007 meeting.

Relationships (4)

Dershowitz professional Epstein
Dershowitz is identified as one of Epstein's attorneys who led the defense team's presentation.
Villafaña professional Lourie
They are colleagues who discussed and disagreed on the analysis of the 'purpose of travel issue' in the Epstein case.
Acosta adversarial (prosecutor-defendant) Epstein
Acosta, as part of the USAO, developed a plea agreement to resolve the federal investigation into Epstein.
Menchel professional Villafaña
Both were USAO personnel who attended the June 26, 2007 meeting and participated in a post-meeting discussion.

Key Quotes (9)

"that over time [Epstein] set up a network of illegal high school massage recruits that would be difficult to duplicate anywhere else,"
Source
— Lourie (Part of an argument the government could make to support the conclusion that massages were a motivating purpose of Epstein's travel.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #1
"getting to the jury"
Source
— Lourie (Expressing concern about the difficulty of successfully arguing the purpose of travel issue to a jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #2
"particularly weak"
Source
— Villafaña and her colleagues (Describing their assessment of certain aspects of the defense submissions.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #3
"listening session"
Source
— USAO (Describing the USAO's perspective on the purpose of the June 26, 2007 meeting with Epstein's attorneys.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #4
"traditionally state offenses"
Source
— Dershowitz (Arguing that the USAO should permit the state to handle the case against Epstein.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #5
"under the impression that they had convinced us not to proceed."
Source
— Villafaña (Describing the apparent belief of Epstein's attorneys after they left the June 26, 2007 meeting.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #6
"[T]hey obviously did not persuade the USAO because ‘we . . . didn’t drop the investigation."
Source
— Menchel (Telling OPR that the defense presentation was not successful in stopping the federal investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #7
"left [the meeting] with the impression that we were continuing towards"
Source
— Villafaña (Describing her takeaway from the meeting, indicating that the USAO intended to proceed with filing charges.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #8
"more as [the USAO] listening and them presenting their position."
Source
— Menchel (From a contemporaneous email describing his view of the upcoming June 26 meeting.)
DOJ-OGR-00021235.jpg
Quote #9

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document