DOJ-OGR-00021095.jpg
666 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
666 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that a charge (Count Six) should be dismissed because the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) is bound by a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The author contends that the NPA shows an "affirmative appearance" of a broad restriction on prosecution for co-conspirators, contrasting it with the specifically limited non-prosecution provision for Epstein, which was restricted to "in this District."
People (3)
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | government agency |
Mentioned as conducting an investigation.
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office | government agency |
Mentioned as conducting an investigation.
|
| USAO-SDNY | government agency |
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, which the document argues was bound by the Non-Pros...
|
Timeline (3 events)
An investigation conducted by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office.
A related grand jury investigation.
Argument that Count Six should be dismissed because the USAO-SDNY was bound by a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A phrase from the NPA used to limit the scope of Epstein's non-prosecution, its absence elsewhere is used as an argum...
|
Relationships (1)
→
legal
→
The document describes a legal relationship between the USAO-SDNY and other parties, established by a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), arguing that the USAO-SDNY is bound by its terms.
Key Quotes (4)
"sufficiently distinct,"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021095.jpg
Quote #1
"it affirmatively appears that the agreement contemplates a broader restriction."Source
— Annabi rule
(A quote from the Annabi rule explaining when its presumption is unavailing.)
DOJ-OGR-00021095.jpg
Quote #2
"affirmative appearance"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021095.jpg
Quote #3
"in this District."Source
— NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement)
(A limiting phrase used in the NPA regarding Epstein's non-prosecution, which is argued to be conspicuously absent from the co-conspirator immunity provision.)
DOJ-OGR-00021095.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document