DOJ-OGR-00002967.jpg
878 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
6
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
878 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing from April 16, 2021, presents an argument about the jurisdictional scope of plea agreements. The author refutes a defendant's motion by citing case law, primarily *Annabi*, to argue that a plea agreement only binds the specific U.S. Attorney's Office that made it, unless it explicitly states a broader scope. The document contrasts this with the defendant's argument that without an explicit limitation, an agreement should bind the entire federal government.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Annabi |
Cited in the case law 'Annabi, 771 F.2d at 672' which establishes a rule regarding the scope of plea agreements.
|
|
| Laskow |
Cited in the case law 'See Laskow, 688 F. Supp. at 854' regarding the presumption of a plea agreement's scope.
|
|
| Feldman |
Cited in the case law 'United States v. Feldman, 939 F.3d 182, 189 (2d Cir. 2019)' as an example of a defendant seeki...
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney | government agency |
Mentioned as the office that is bound by a plea agreement within a specific district.
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office | government agency |
The specific office that executes a plea agreement and is bound by its terms.
|
| the Government | government agency |
Referenced in plea agreements; the document discusses whether this term binds the entire federal government.
|
| the United States | government agency |
Used interchangeably with 'the Government' in reference to a party in a plea agreement.
|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
A judicial circuit whose legal holdings are cited, specifically regarding the construction of plea agreements.
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears as a document identifier in the footer (DOJ-OGR-00002967), likely referring to a Department of Justice office...
|
Relationships (1)
The document discusses a plea agreement between the defendant and the Government, and analyzes the defendant's motion against the Government's position based on legal precedent.
Key Quotes (2)
"expressly limits the scope of the agreement to the district"Source
— document author (describing a hypothetical provision)
(Used to describe a type of provision that might be absent from a plea agreement, which affects its scope.)
DOJ-OGR-00002967.jpg
Quote #1
"Defendant’s argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is presumed that a non-prosecution agreement binds offices of the United States Attorney that are"Source
— document author
(A summary of the defendant's legal argument regarding the scope of plea agreements.)
DOJ-OGR-00002967.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document