DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg

843 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
7
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
10
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 843 KB
Summary

This legal document details a March 12, 2008 meeting where Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, including Ken Starr, presented their case to officials from the DOJ's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS). Following the meeting, the defense team submitted written complaints about the U.S. Attorney's Office's conduct, alleging improper coordination with state authorities and conflicts of interest. Footnotes reveal communications indicating the defense team actively tried to block communication between federal and state prosecutors.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Ken Starr
Attended a March 12, 2008 meeting as part of the Epstein defense team and made written submissions to the Criminal Di...
Lefkowitz
Attended a March 12, 2008 meeting as part of the Epstein defense team and made written submissions to the Criminal Di...
Martin Weinberg
Attended the March 12, 2008 meeting as part of the Epstein defense team.
Oosterbaan former Principal Deputy Chief of CEOS
Represented the Department at the March 12, 2008 meeting and provided recollections of it to OPR.
Mandelker current CEOS Deputy Chief
Represented the Department at the March 12, 2008 meeting.
Epstein
Subject of the defense team's efforts, sentencing, and civil suits mentioned in the document.
Sloman Assistant United States Attorney (implied)
Mentioned in relation to a purported 'relationship' with a victims' law firm, correspondence with Lefkowitz, and brie...
Villafaña
Mentioned in a footnote regarding her understanding of communications between the USAO and state authorities, and her...
Acosta
Mentioned in a footnote as a recipient of a report from Villafaña.
Krischer
Mentioned in a footnote as having complained to Villafaña about the USAO's lack of communication.

Organizations (7)

Name Type Context
DOJ government agency
Department of Justice, mentioned as the body for appellate review.
CEOS government agency
Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the DOJ. Oosterbaan and Mandelker were officials there.
The Department government agency
Synonym for the Department of Justice, represented by Oosterbaan and Mandelker at the meeting.
OPR government agency
Office of Professional Responsibility, which received information from Oosterbaan and a CEOS Deputy Chief about the m...
Criminal Division government agency
A division of the DOJ to which Starr and Lefkowitz made written submissions.
USAO government agency
United States Attorney's Office. The defense team submitted a list of complaints about its actions. Sloman worked for...
State Attorney’s Office government agency
Mentioned in a footnote regarding communications that the defense team allegedly sought to restrict.

Timeline (2 events)

2001
Sloman briefly left the USAO to go into private practice with a Miami attorney specializing in sexual abuse claims.
Miami
2008-03-12
A meeting between Epstein's defense team and DOJ officials to discuss the case. It was described as a 'listening session' where the defense presented its arguments.
The Department (DOJ)
Starr Lefkowitz Martin Weinberg Oosterbaan Mandelker former Principal Deputy Chief of CEOS

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in footnote 165 as the location of an attorney with whom Sloman was in private practice.

Relationships (5)

Ken Starr professional Jeffrey Epstein
Starr was a member of Epstein's defense team and attended a meeting on his behalf.
Lefkowitz professional Jeffrey Epstein
Lefkowitz was a member of Epstein's defense team and attended a meeting on his behalf.
Martin Weinberg professional Jeffrey Epstein
Weinberg was a member of Epstein's defense team and attended a meeting on his behalf.
Starr adversarial Oosterbaan
Met on March 12, 2008, where Starr's defense team presented arguments that Oosterbaan, a DOJ official, described as 'outrageous things'.
Sloman adversarial Lefkowitz
Sloman, from the USAO, sent correspondence to Lefkowitz of the defense team, expressing concern about the defense's attempts to restrict communications.

Key Quotes (10)

"listening session"
Source
— current CEOS Deputy Chief (Describing the nature of the March 12, 2008 meeting with Starr.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #1
"some back and forth"
Source
— Oosterbaan (Recalling the dynamic of the March 12, 2008 meeting.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #2
"some outrageous things"
Source
— Oosterbaan (Recalling what the defense team was saying during the meeting.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #3
"weak pitch"
Source
— CEOS Deputy Chief (Describing the contribution of the former CEOS Principal Deputy Chief who had joined the defense team.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #4
"have caused us serious concern"
Source
— Starr and Lefkowitz (In a written submission to the Criminal Division regarding the USAO's actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #5
"Federal involvement in a state criminal prosecution without any communication with state authorities"
Source
— Starr and Lefkowitz (One of the specific complaints made against the USAO.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #6
"had no connection to the conduct at issue"
Source
— Starr and Lefkowitz (Describing items for which the USAO issued legal process and document requests.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #7
"relationship"
Source
— Starr and Lefkowitz (Describing the purported existence of a connection between Sloman and a law firm representing victims.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #8
"Your recent correspondence attempting to restrict our Office from communicating with the State Attorney’s Office . . . raises concern."
Source
— Sloman (In a November 2007 communication to Lefkowitz, as cited in footnote 164.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #9
"it was the defense who were blocking the channels of communication."
Source
— Villafaña (Her explanation to Krischer as to why the USAO had not been communicating with him, as cited in footnote 164.)
DOJ-OGR-00021306.jpg
Quote #10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document