DOJ-OGR-00009372.jpg
404 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
404 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on February 24, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, who is questioned about their firm's decision not to investigate potential juror misconduct by Juror No. 1, Ms. Conrad, following a verdict on May 24th. Brune states that the firm did not believe there was an issue to investigate at the time.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Subject of a cross-examination, answering questions about why their firm did not investigate a juror.
|
| Ms. Conrad | Juror No. 1 |
The subject of a potential investigation regarding juror misconduct.
|
| MR. SHECHTMAN | Counsel |
An attorney who concludes his questioning of the witness.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceedings, referred to as 'THE COURT' and 'your Honor'.
|
| Ms. Davis | Counsel |
An attorney who is prompted by the judge for a redirect examination.
|
| MR. DAVIS | Counsel |
An attorney who speaks on behalf of the defense counsel and addresses the court.
|
| MR. GAIR | Defense Counsel |
An attorney who declines to inquire further.
|
| MR. ROBERT | Defense Counsel |
An attorney who declines to inquire further.
|
| MS. MCCARTHY | Defense Counsel |
An attorney who declines to inquire further.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nardello firm | company |
A firm that was considered for conducting an investigation into Ms. Conrad.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A verdict in a case was reached on May 24th.
Cross-examination of witness Brune regarding the decision not to investigate Juror No. 1, Ms. Conrad, for misconduct.
Courtroom
Relationships (4)
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, a formal legal interaction.
Mr. Shechtman addresses the Judge directly during the court proceeding.
The Judge addresses Ms. Davis to ask if she has a redirect examination.
Key Quotes (2)
"We spent a lot of time thinking about appellate issues, but we didn't think that there had been juror misconduct and therefore didn't think that there was an appellate issue."Source
— Brune
(Explaining why their firm did not investigate potential juror misconduct after the verdict.)
DOJ-OGR-00009372.jpg
Quote #1
"I didn't think there was anything to investigate."Source
— Brune
(Answering why their firm did not contact the Nardello firm to investigate Ms. Conrad.)
DOJ-OGR-00009372.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document