DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg

765 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 765 KB
Summary

This legal document is a portion of a court filing, likely from the prosecution, arguing against a defendant's motion. The prosecution asserts that the defendant's false statements, made in a civil deposition, were intended to obstruct a criminal investigation by the FBI and a grand jury, and are therefore connected to the substantive offenses. The argument cites several legal precedents to support the claim that the charges should not be severed.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Brown Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'United States v. Brown, No. 07-0296, 2008 WL 161146'.
Martinez Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'United States v. Martinez, No. 92 Cr. 839'.
Ruiz Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'See Ruiz, 894 F.2d at 505'.
Potamitis Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'Potamitis, 739 F.2d at 791'.
Carson Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'United States v. Carson, 464 F.2d 424, 436'.
Sweig Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'Sweig, 441 F.2d at 118-19'.
Broccolo Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the citation 'Cf. Broccolo, 797 F. Supp. at 1190'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
FBI government agency
Mentioned as a potential target of an attempt to derail an investigation: '...rather than “to the grand jury or the F...
Boies Schiller company
Recipient of a grand jury subpoena: '...grand jury subpoena issued to Boies Schiller...'

Timeline (3 events)

The defendant made false statements during a civil deposition.
defendant
The defendant filed motions to suppress the fruits of a grand jury subpoena.
defendant
The defendant was concerned about the prospect of a criminal investigation at the time of her depositions.
defendant grand jury FBI

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the court in the 'United States v. Brown' case citation, referring to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Location of the court in the 'United States v. Martinez' case citation, referring to the Southern District of New York.

Relationships (2)

defendant adversarial FBI
The document alleges the defendant made false statements to 'derail its investigation'.
defendant adversarial grand jury
The document alleges the defendant made false statements to derail the grand jury's investigation and filed motions to suppress a grand jury subpoena.

Key Quotes (5)

"isolated"
Source
— Court in United States v. Brown (Describing a firearms possession charge that was severed from other charges.)
DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg
Quote #1
"to the grand jury or the FBI to derail its investigation."
Source
— defendant (as quoted in the document) (The defendant's contention regarding where her false statements were made and their purpose.)
DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg
Quote #2
"flatly rejected"
Source
— defendant (as quoted in the document) (Describing the defendant's rejection of a law enforcement exception to a civil protective order.)
DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg
Quote #3
"declined to invoke"
Source
— defendant (as quoted in the document) (Describing the defendant's decision not to use her Fifth Amendment privilege at a deposition.)
DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg
Quote #4
"concern the substantive offenses"
Source
— Court in a cited case (A legal standard for affirming the denial of a severance motion, where false statements relate to the main charges.)
DOJ-OGR-00003106.jpg
Quote #5

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document