DOJ-OGR-00002540.jpg
1.11 MB
Extraction Summary
9
People
8
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.11 MB
Summary
This legal document outlines the scope and methodology of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. Prompted by a February 21, 2019, court ruling that the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) violated victims' rights, the OPR's review examined government conduct, collected extensive records, and conducted over 60 interviews. The investigation identified five subjects, including former U.S. Attorney Acosta, for their roles in the non-prosecution agreement (NPA) and related decisions.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Mentioned throughout as the subject of the federal and state investigations being reviewed by OPR.
|
| Acosta | former U.S. Attorney |
Identified as one of the five subjects of the OPR investigation regarding his involvement in the decision to resolve ...
|
| three former USAO supervisors | former USAO supervisors |
Identified as subjects of the OPR investigation for their involvement in the Epstein case resolution.
|
| the AUSA | Assistant United States Attorney |
Identified as a subject of the OPR investigation for involvement in the Epstein case resolution.
|
| former Deputy Attorney General | former Deputy Attorney General |
Interviewed by OPR as a witness during their investigation.
|
| former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division | former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division |
Interviewed by OPR as a witness during their investigation.
|
| former State Attorney | former State Attorney |
Interviewed by OPR as a witness in charge of the state investigation of Epstein.
|
| former Assistant State Attorney | former Assistant State Attorney |
Interviewed by OPR as a witness in charge of the state investigation of Epstein.
|
| U.S. Senators and Representatives | Legislators |
Mentioned in a footnote as having sent letters to OPR inquiring about the status of its investigation.
|
Organizations (8)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAO | government agency |
U.S. Attorney's Office. The subject of an OPR review for its decision to resolve the Epstein investigation with an NP...
|
| OPR | government agency |
Office of Professional Responsibility. The agency conducting the investigation into the government's handling of the ...
|
| district court | government agency |
Issued a ruling in the CVRA litigation that prompted OPR to expand the scope of its investigation.
|
| FBI | government agency |
Federal Bureau of Investigation. OPR obtained records from the FBI and interviewed its case agents, supervisors, and ...
|
| Department components | government agency |
A general term for various parts of the Department of Justice from which OPR obtained records.
|
| Office of the Deputy Attorney General | government agency |
A Department of Justice component from which OPR obtained records and interviewed a former official.
|
| Criminal Division | government agency |
A Department of Justice component from which OPR obtained records and interviewed a former official.
|
| Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys | government agency |
A Department of Justice component from which OPR obtained records.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2018-12-22
The federal government was closed from December 22, 2018, to January 25, 2019.
federal government
2019-02-21
The district court issued its ruling in the CVRA litigation, finding that the USAO violated the CVRA by failing to confer with victims and misleading them about the federal investigation. This prompted OPR to expand its own investigation.
Relationships (3)
OPR identified former U.S. Attorney Acosta as a subject of its investigation into the handling of the Epstein case.
The district court found that the USAO violated the CVRA by failing to afford victims a reasonable right to confer with the government and affirmatively misled them.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document