DOJ-OGR-00019521.jpg

549 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 549 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated July 28, 2020, is a filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution argues against a defendant's motion to impose restrictions on the government and third parties, labeling the request as unprecedented and without legal basis. The government urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and instead implement the government's own proposed protective order.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan Honorable (Judge)
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
AUDREY STRAUSS Acting United States Attorney
Listed as the signatory on behalf of the Government.
Alex Rossmiller Assistant United States Attorney
Listed as one of the attorneys submitting the document.
Alison Moe Assistant United States Attorney
Listed as one of the attorneys submitting the document.
Maurene Comey Assistant United States Attorney
Listed as one of the attorneys submitting the document.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Mentioned throughout as a party in the legal case, referring to the U.S. Government/prosecution.
Court government agency
Referenced as the body that should rule on the motions presented.
United States Attorney, Southern District of New York government agency
The office submitting the document, as indicated in the signature block.

Timeline (1 events)

2020-07-28
The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing against a defendant's motion and in favor of its own proposed protective order.
Southern District of New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the signature block as the jurisdiction of the United States Attorneys.

Relationships (1)

Government adversarial defendant
The document details the Government's opposition to a motion made by the defendant in a criminal case.

Key Quotes (1)

"on equal footing with the defense"
Source
— The defendant (Quoted as the defendant's counter-argument that the Court should put third parties on equal footing with the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00019521.jpg
Quote #1

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document