HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016532.jpg
2.89 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal review article / congressional record
File Size:
2.89 MB
Summary
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the pros and cons of federalism-based enforcement redundancy in criminal law, specifically comparing it to private prosecution and administrative review. It argues that while federalism offers a check on state underenforcement, it relies heavily on the discretion of federal prosecutors rather than private victims. The text is heavily footnoted with references to UK and Canadian case law regarding prosecutorial oversight.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | ||
| Alex Hunt | ||
| Brian Wheeler | ||
| Andrew Ashworth | ||
| Mike Redmayne | ||
| Williams |
Organizations (5)
Timeline (2 events)
Brexit
Creation of Crown Prosecution Service (1985)
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (2)
"The federalism route to prosecutorial oversight, by contrast, gives private parties no formal role"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016532.jpg
Quote #1
"federal prosecution as check on state underenforcement rests more directly on the initiative, diligence, and judgment of federal prosecutors than private victims"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016532.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document