DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
1020 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
8
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1020 KB
Summary
This document details the rationale behind Alexander Acosta's decision to pursue a state-based, pre-charge disposition in the Jeffrey Epstein case instead of a federal trial. Acosta explained to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) that his decision was based on federalism concerns, the weakness of the case, and a desire to act as a 'backstop' to the state prosecution, ensuring Epstein was registered as a sex offender. This contrasts with the views of other prosecutors, like Villafaña, who believed strongly in the federal case and wanted to proceed to trial.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Villafaña | Prosecutor |
Believed she could have prevailed in a trial against Epstein and repeatedly recommended proceeding with an indictment.
|
| Epstein | Defendant/Subject of investigation |
The subject of a federal prosecution and investigation discussed throughout the document.
|
| Oosterbaan | null |
Believed that the government would succeed at trial against Epstein.
|
| Acosta | Decision-maker (likely U.S. Attorney) |
Assumed responsibility for deciding how to resolve the Epstein investigation, ultimately opting for a state-based, pr...
|
| Sloman | null |
Discussed the Epstein case with Acosta. Also told OPR that Villafaña "always believed in the case."
|
| Menchel | null |
Discussed the Epstein case with Acosta.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAO | Government agency |
United States Attorney's Office, which was handling the federal prosecution of Epstein.
|
| OPR | Government agency |
Office of Professional Responsibility, which was investigating Acosta's decision-making process.
|
| United States Attorney’s Office | Government agency |
Mentioned by Acosta as the type of office that would not typically get involved in a state solicitation case in 2006.
|
| PBPD | Government agency |
Mentioned as the entity Acosta understood would not have brought the case to federal investigators if the state pursu...
|
| State Attorney’s Office | Government agency |
The state-level prosecuting body that was pursuing a sanction against Epstein.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (4)
Acosta discussed the Epstein case primarily with Sloman and Menchel.
Villafaña believed the case should go to trial and repeatedly recommended indictment, a view that contrasts with Acosta's final decision to pursue a pre-charge disposition.
Both Villafaña and Oosterbaan believed the government would succeed at trial, indicating they shared a similar view on the case's strength.
Key Quotes (8)
"in 2006, it would have been extremely unusual for any United States Attorney’s Office to become involved in a state solicitation case, even one involving underage teens,"Source
— Acosta
(Explaining his rationale to OPR for deferring to state prosecutors.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #1
"the province of state prosecutors."Source
— Acosta
(Describing his view on solicitation cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #2
"a preference for deferring to the state"Source
— Acosta
(Describing his approach to the Epstein case to OPR.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #3
"make it clear that [the USAO was] not stepping on something that is a purely local matter, because we [didn’t] want bad precedent for the sake of the larger human trafficking issue."Source
— Acosta
(Explaining his federalism concerns to OPR.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #4
"a polite way of saying[, ‘]encouraging the state to do a little bit more.[’]"Source
— Acosta
(Describing the USAO's role as a 'backstop' to the state's prosecution.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #5
"uncharted territory"Source
— Acosta
(Describing the Epstein case to OPR, highlighting the uncertainty of a trial outcome.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #6
"weighed against a certain plea with registration that would make sure that the public knew that this person was a sex offender."Source
— Acosta
(Justifying the decision for a plea deal by contrasting the risk of an unfavorable trial outcome with the certainty of a plea.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #7
"always believed in the case."Source
— Villafaña (as reported by Sloman)
(Footnote 220, where Sloman tells OPR about Villafaña's confidence in the prosecution against Epstein.)
DOJ-OGR-00021348.jpg
Quote #8
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document