EFTA00030148.pdf
158 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
158 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorney Andrew Patel and likely the US Attorney's Office regarding the Epstein case. The discussion centers on the Government's obligation to produce notes from a meeting with Patel's client (whose name is redacted) to the defense counsel. Patel argues that his client is not a witness, the information is not Brady material (exculpatory evidence), and that revealing his client's identity or the fact that he met with the Government could compromise his safety. Patel notes that an 'error' made by his client is contradicted by surveillance video evidence.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew G. Patel | Attorney at Law |
Representing a client ('Mr. [Redacted]') who met with the Government; negotiating with the Government regarding the d...
|
| Jill Shellow | Attorney |
Cc'd on the email chain.
|
| Don Yannella | Attorney |
Cc'd on the email chain.
|
| Judge Torres | Judge |
Presiding Judge; the attorneys are drafting letters and potential motions to be submitted to her regarding protective...
|
| Justina | Unknown (likely Government personnel) |
Mentioned as being aware that notes are being provided.
|
| Mr. [Redacted] | Client of Andrew Patel |
The subject of the disclosure dispute. Met with the Government office. Patel argues he is not a witness and the mater...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| US District Court |
Implied by references to Judge Torres and legal filings.
|
|
| US Attorney's Office / The Government |
The entity communicating with Patel, referred to as 'your Office' and 'the Government'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-12-26
Legal negotiation regarding discovery production in the Epstein case.
Email correspondence
Andrew Patel
Government Counsel
Unknown (prior to Dec 2019)
Meeting between Andrew Patel's client and the Government (US Attorney's Office).
Unknown
Mr. [Redacted]
Government Officials
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 212 area code and SDNY context.
|
Relationships (2)
Patel refers to him as 'our client' throughout the emails.
Patel mentions 'the fact that he met with your Office' and discusses the Government's disclosure obligations regarding notes from that meeting.
Key Quotes (4)
"Our client is not a witness, and so this is not 3500 material, nor is it Rule 16 material."Source
EFTA00030148.pdf
Quote #1
"We do not believe that this is in fact Brady material, but rather is an error made by our client that we understand is contradicted by the surveillance video evidence."Source
EFTA00030148.pdf
Quote #2
"we have an obligation to make sure that our client is not harmed by the possible release of the fact that he met with your Office."Source
EFTA00030148.pdf
Quote #3
"We plan to produce the redacted notes to the defense pursuant to the protective order, and the name on an AEO basis to defense counsel."Source
EFTA00030148.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document