DOJ-OGR-00002835.jpg

740 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal opinion (page 14 of 20)
File Size: 740 KB
Summary

This document is page 14 of a court order filed on August 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548). The text analyzes a Sixth Amendment challenge regarding jury underrepresentation, specifically examining the 'absolute disparity method' for African American and Hispanic American representation in the White Plains master jury wheel. The Court concludes that the statistical disparities (1.25% and 1.15%) are within tolerated legal limits based on Second Circuit precedents and that Schulte has failed to meet the necessary burden for his claim.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Schulte Defendant/Movant
The individual challenging the jury composition ('Schulte has not met'). Refers to Joshua Schulte (Case 1:17-cr-00548).
Biaggi Legal Precedent
Cited in United States v. Biaggi regarding jury disparity statistics.
Rioux Legal Precedent
Cited case regarding jury representation analysis.
Duren Legal Standard
Refers to the legal standard for underrepresentation ('Duren's second element').
Allen Legal Precedent
Cited case regarding jury disparity.
Barnes Legal Precedent
Cited case regarding jury disparity.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit
The appellate court jurisdiction whose precedents are being applied.
The Court
The judicial body issuing this opinion.
Gov't
The Government/Prosecution (referenced in 'Gov't Opp. Br.').
DOJ-OGR
Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations (referenced in footer stamp).

Timeline (1 events)

2021-08-24
Filing of Document 859 in Case 1:17-cr-00548-PAC
Court
Court Schulte

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the 'master wheel' (jury pool) being analyzed.

Relationships (1)

Schulte Legal Adversaries Gov't
References to 'Schulte Reply' and 'Gov't Opp. Br.'

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court holds that the absolute disparities here fall comfortably within the outer limits provided by these past decisions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002835.jpg
Quote #1
"Accordingly, the absolute disparities are 1.25% for African Americans (12.45% - 11.20%) and 1.15% for Hispanic Americans (14.12% - 12.97%)."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002835.jpg
Quote #2
"Because those figures fall comfortably within the tolerated disparities in past precedents, the Court concludes that Schulte has not met"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00002835.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document