DOJ-OGR-00003188.jpg
1.26 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / report finding
File Size:
1.26 MB
Summary
This document details the findings of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation by Acosta and the USAO. While the report concludes that Acosta did not commit professional misconduct, it determines that his decision to use a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) constituted poor judgment due to flawed applications of federalism and insufficient oversight. Additionally, the document addresses interactions with victims, concluding that attorneys did not violate the CVRA as interpreted at the time, though the lack of consultation is noted.
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR | ||
| USAO | ||
| Department | ||
| federal government | ||
| federal courts |
Timeline (4 events)
federal prosecution of Epstein
breakfast meeting
October 2007
signing of the NPA
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
to
→
→
to
Key Quotes (4)
"OPR does not find evidence that his decision was based on corruption or other impermissible considerations, such as Epstein’s wealth, status, or associations."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003188.jpg
Quote #1
"Nevertheless, OPR concludes that Acosta’s decision to resolve the federal investigation through the NPA constitutes poor judgment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003188.jpg
Quote #2
"The NPA was a unique resolution, and one that required greater oversight and supervision than Acosta provided."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003188.jpg
Quote #3
"OPR further concludes that none of the subject attorneys committed professional misconduct with respect to the government’s interactions with victims."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003188.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document