017-05.pdf
205 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (omnibus order)
File Size:
205 KB
Summary
This document is an Omnibus Order from the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida dated February 4, 2010, in the civil case of Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. The Magistrate Judge rules on the Plaintiff's motions to compel answers to interrogatories, admissions, and production requests. The court upholds Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding questions about his financial history, assets, and potential witnesses, but orders him to produce documents that are already known to the government (tax returns, passport, and documents provided to him during plea negotiations), ruling that these fall under the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff |
Former under-age girl alleging sexual assault by defendant.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Accused of sexual assault, battery, and coercion of minors.
|
| Sarah Kellen | Assistant |
Epstein's assistant, allegedly helped lure disadvantaged minor girls to his homes.
|
| Linnea R. Johnson | Magistrate Judge |
United States Magistrate Judge who signed the order.
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | District Judge |
Referenced in the CC list.
|
| Dr. Stephen Alexander | Doctor |
Epstein's doctor; his medical records were requested by the plaintiff but denied by the court.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court issuing the order
|
|
| United States Attorney General’s Office |
Federal office involved in the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement
|
|
| State Attorney’s Office for Palm Beach County |
State office involved in the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement
|
|
| IRS |
Internal Revenue Service, mentioned in context of tax returns and the 'foregone conclusion' doctrine.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2004-2005
Alleged scheme of sexual assault involving underage girls took place.
Palm Beach, New York, St. Thomas
2008
Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the US Attorney's Office and State Attorney's Office.
Southern District of Florida
2010-02-04
Omnibus Order issued by Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson.
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Epstein's mansion home location where alleged assaults occurred; location of the court.
|
|
|
Location of one of Epstein's homes where girls were allegedly lured.
|
|
|
Location of one of Epstein's homes where girls were allegedly lured.
|
Relationships (2)
Epstein, with the help of his assistant Sarah Kellen, allegedly lured economically disadvantaged minor girls
Epstein’s medical records from Dr. Stephen Alexander (Request 16).
Key Quotes (6)
"Epstein, with the help of his assistant Sarah Kellen, allegedly lured economically disadvantaged minor girls to his homes in Palm beach, New York and St. Thomas, with the promise of money in exchange for a massage."Source
017-05.pdf
Quote #1
"The mere fact the Government and Epstein have entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement does not mean that Epstein is free from future criminal prosecution."Source
017-05.pdf
Quote #2
"Asking Epstein to identify persons or witnesses who may have knowledge of the events in question... would violate the Fifth Amendment in that Epstein would be forced to incriminate himself in the commission of crimes."Source
017-05.pdf
Quote #3
"Requests 7, 9 and 10 seek production of documents the government itself gave to Epstein, making the government’s prior knowledge of the documents sought an obvious and undeniable 'foregone conclusion.'"Source
017-05.pdf
Quote #4
"Since Epstein is required to show his Passport to Government officials every time he travels outside the United States, the Government undeniably has 'prior knowledge' of the Passport’s existence, and its whereabouts is a 'foregone' conclusion."Source
017-05.pdf
Quote #5
"Epstein has ten (10) days from the date hereof to provide the discovery subject to these Requests."Source
017-05.pdf
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document