DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
1 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1 MB
Summary
This legal document, part of an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, analyzes whether Alexander Acosta's actions in the Jeffrey Epstein case were motivated by improper influences. It argues that Acosta's decision to pursue a federal non-prosecution agreement (NPA), which included jail time and sex offender registration, was a more stringent outcome than the likely state-level sentence, which prosecutor Menchel described as a mere 'slap on the wrist.' The document uses this and other evidence, including recollections from prosecutors Sloman and Menchel, to suggest Acosta was not acting to improperly benefit Epstein but was navigating complex policy and federalism issues.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Sloman |
Told OPR about Acosta's concerns regarding policy and federalism issues in the Epstein case.
|
|
| Acosta |
His decision-making in the Epstein case is the central subject of this document. He was concerned about policy and fe...
|
|
| Menchel |
Interviewed by OPR, he recalled Acosta's perspective, described the potential state sentence for Epstein as a 'slap o...
|
|
| Epstein | Subject of investigation |
The subject of the case whose plea deal (NPA) is being discussed. The document analyzes whether Acosta's actions were...
|
| Villafaña |
Recounted an exchange between the USAO team and a defense attorney for OPR, mentioned in a footnote.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR | government agency |
Office of Professional Responsibility, which conducted interviews with Sloman and Menchel and analyzed Acosta's actio...
|
| USAO | government agency |
U.S. Attorney's Office, the federal body that handled the Epstein investigation and devised the NPA.
|
| State Attorney’s Office | government agency |
The state-level prosecuting body that had a case against Epstein, which was considered less severe than the federal r...
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (3)
The document analyzes whether Acosta's actions as a prosecutor were improperly motivated to benefit Epstein, the subject of the investigation.
Sloman recalled conversations with Acosta about policy concerns related to the Epstein case, indicating they worked together or discussed the case.
Key Quotes (6)
"overstepping our bounds by taking what is a traditional state case that was in the State Attorney’s Office that was resolved by the State Attorney’s Office at some level."Source
— Sloman
(Describing the nature of the Petite policy and federalism concerns that Acosta had.)
DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
Quote #1
"a broader policy perspective"Source
— Menchel
(Describing how he remembered Acosta approaching the Epstein case.)
DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
Quote #2
"the impact that taking the case in federally may have on . . . other programs,"Source
— Menchel
(Recalling Acosta's worries about the broader implications of the federal prosecution.)
DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
Quote #3
"slap on the wrist,” with “no jail time, no felony sex offense, no sexual offender registration, [and] no restitution for the victims."Source
— Menchel
(Describing the likely sentence Epstein would have received under the state's original plan.)
DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
Quote #4
"I don’t think it would have been a concern of mine."Source
— Menchel
(A comment in a footnote contrasting his own view with Acosta's sensitivity to policy concerns.)
DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
Quote #5
"we were prosecuting [Epstein] because he was Jewish. We then pointed out that a number of members of [the USAO] chain of command were Jewish. Then he said, well we’re prosecuting him because he was a Democrat. And again, we pointed out that a number of us were Democrats. So then it went to, we were prosecuting him because he was wealthy. . . . That one didn’t work so well."Source
— defense attorney (recounted by Villafaña)
(An exchange from a meeting where a defense attorney argued about the motivations for Epstein's prosecution.)
DOJ-OGR-00021349.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document