DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
82 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
6
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Report excerpt
File Size:
82 KB
Summary
This document discusses the application of victim rights legislation (VRRA and CVRA) to the Epstein investigation, specifically focusing on victim notification and consultation. It details how the VRRA's provisions regarding victim services and notice may have applied to Epstein's case, and OPR's findings on whether the lack of victim consultation was intended to silence victims, highlighting conflicting recollections among individuals involved.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Investigation into Epstein, guilty pleas in June 2008
|
| Villafaña | Interviewee/Individual involved in discussions |
Recalled discussions about consulting victims during OPR interviews; her recollection suggests concerns about confide...
|
| Acosta | Supervisor/Individual involved in discussions |
Had no recollection of discussions about consulting victims; suggested to be concerned with confidentiality of plea n...
|
| Sloman | Supervisor/Individual involved in discussions |
Had no recollection of discussions about consulting victims; suggested to be concerned with confidentiality of plea n...
|
| Menchel | Supervisor/Individual involved in discussions |
Had no recollection of discussions about consulting victims; disputed Villafaña's assertions; suggested to be concern...
|
| Lourie | Supervisor/Individual involved in discussions |
Had no recollection of discussions about consulting victims
|
| Smith | Defendant in a separate case |
Referenced in legal comparison; criminal defendant arrested and charged before entering a plea
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Eleventh Circuit |
Panel compared CVRA and VRRA language in 'Wild' case
|
|
| OPR |
Office of Professional Responsibility, conducted interviews and investigations into consultation issues
|
|
| USAO |
United States Attorney's Office, identified victims and furnished notification for § 2255 remedy
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (6)
Villafaña raised issue with supervisors (Acosta among them); Acosta had no recollection.
Villafaña raised issue with supervisors (Sloman among them); Sloman had no recollection.
Villafaña raised issue with supervisors (Menchel among them); Menchel disputed Villafaña's assertions.
Villafaña raised issue with supervisors (Lourie among them); Lourie had no recollection.
Mentioned together as potentially concerned with confidentiality of plea negotiations.
Key Quotes (6)
""clearly extends victim-notice rights into the pre-charge phase""Source
DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
Quote #1
""may well have violated""Source
DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
Quote #2
""inform a victim of any restitution or other relief to which the victim may be entitled""Source
DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
Quote #3
""shall provide a victim the earliest possible notice of the status of the investigation of the crime, to the extent it is appropriate to inform the victim and to the extent that it will not interfere with the investigation""Source
DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
Quote #4
""under investigation""Source
DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
Quote #5
""a case originating by indictment or information filed in a circuit court.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00023296.tif
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document