HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225.jpg
2.51 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Academic text / book excerpt (evidence exhibit)
File Size:
2.51 MB
Summary
This document is page 309 from a book or academic paper titled '17.2 Measuring Incremental Progress Toward Human-Level AGI'. The text discusses the challenges of measuring progress in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), arguing against simple metrics like the Turing Test in favor of a competency-based approach inspired by human cognitive development. It references psychologists Piaget and Vygotsky and outlines a roadmap for defining AGI competencies. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225', indicating it was collected as evidence by the House Oversight Committee, likely in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's known funding of and connections to the scientific community and AI research.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Piaget | Psychologist (referenced) |
Cited as an early thinker who outlined systematic theories of child cognitive development.
|
| Vygotsky | Psychologist (referenced) |
Cited as an early thinker who outlined systematic theories of child cognitive development.
|
| Authors (unnamed) | Researchers/Writers |
The text uses 'we' and 'our', discussing their approach to AGI and arguments made in 'Chapter 8'.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225' at the bottom of the page.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"Measuring incremental progress toward human-level AGI is a subtle thing, and we argue that the best way to do it is to focus on particular scenarios and the achievement of specific competencies therein."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225.jpg
Quote #1
"Based on the nature of the grand goals articulated above, there seems to be a very natural approach to creating a set of incremental capabilities building toward AGI: to draw on our copious knowledge about human cognitive development."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225.jpg
Quote #2
"Fooling 50% of the Turing Test judges is not a good measure of being 50% of the way to passing the Turing Test"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225.jpg
Quote #3
"We are not claiming this as a precise or exhaustive list of the competencies characterizing human-level general intelligence"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document