DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg

990 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
9
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 990 KB
Summary

This document is a page from an OPR report investigating a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein. It details the conflicting recollections of prosecutors Acosta and Lourie regarding a broad provision not to prosecute 'potential co-conspirators,' with Lourie suggesting it could have been a message to victims while Acosta focused on Epstein's punishment. OPR concludes the provision was likely intended to protect Epstein's four assistants and other employees, not victims or his influential associates, and that its inclusion was not carefully considered by the USAO.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Lourie
Described the promise not to prosecute “potential co-conspirators” as “unusual” and provided his interpretation of th...
Epstein
The central subject of the federal investigation and the non-prosecution agreement. The provision was understood by S...
Acosta
Did not recall discussions about the non-prosecution provision but told OPR that Epstein was the focus of the investi...
Villafaña
Assumed by Acosta to have considered the provision. OPR concluded he agreed to the provision. The footnote states he ...
Sloman
Was not involved in negotiating the NPA and told OPR he understood the provision was to protect Epstein's four assist...
Menchel
Mentioned in a footnote as having left the USAO on August 3, 2007, before the NPA was drafted.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
OPR government agency
The investigating body (Office of Professional Responsibility) to whom Lourie, Acosta, and Sloman provided their reco...
USAO government agency
The U.S. Attorney's Office, which handled the investigation and non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. The document ...

Timeline (3 events)

2007-08-03
Menchel left the USAO before the parties drafted the NPA.
Negotiation and drafting of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that included a broad provision not to prosecute 'any potential co-conspirators'.
Lourie Acosta Villafaña Epstein's defense
OPR's investigation into the non-prosecution provision and whether Epstein received special treatment.

Relationships (3)

Acosta professional Villafaña
Acosta told OPR that he assumed Villafaña and Lourie had considered the non-prosecution provision and decided it was appropriate.
Acosta professional Lourie
Acosta told OPR that he assumed Villafaña and Lourie had considered the non-prosecution provision and decided it was appropriate.
Epstein employer-employee unnamed assistants
The document mentions Epstein's 'four assistants' and 'unnamed employees of a specific Epstein company' who the non-prosecution provision was believed to protect.

Key Quotes (9)

"potential co-conspirators"
Source
— Lourie (Describing the promise in the non-prosecution agreement.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #1
"unusual"
Source
— Lourie (His description of the promise not to prosecute co-conspirators.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #2
"unlike me if I read that language to just leave it in there unless I thought it was somehow helpful."
Source
— Lourie (Explaining to OPR why he would not have ignored the provision's inclusion in the agreement.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #3
"theoretically"
Source
— Lourie (Used when positing that victims who recruited others could have been charged as co-conspirators.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #4
"a message to any victims that had recruited other victims that there was no intent to charge them."
Source
— Lourie (His potential understanding of the reference to unnamed 'co-conspirators' when he saw the provision.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #5
"the focus"
Source
— Acosta (Stating that Epstein was always the focus of the federal investigation.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #6
"meaningful consequences"
Source
— Acosta (The standard he believed Epstein needed to face for federal interests to be vindicated.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #7
"[t]o the extent I reviewed this co-conspirator provision, I can speculate that my thinking would have been the focus is on Epstein[ ] . . . going to jail. Whether some of his employees go to jail, or other, lesser involved [individuals], is not the focus of this."
Source
— Acosta (Telling OPR his thought process when reviewing the draft NPA.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #8
"never dawned"
Source
— Sloman (Stating it never occurred to him that the provision was intended to shield anyone other than Epstein's four assistants.)
DOJ-OGR-00021368.jpg
Quote #9

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document