HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017932.jpg
3.19 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court opinion page
File Size:
3.19 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a court opinion (392 F.Supp.2d 539) concerning the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the court's decision to prioritize personal jurisdiction discovery over subject matter jurisdiction (FSIA) for NCB to avoid intrusion into Saudi Arabia's sovereignty. The conclusion section lists rulings granting motions to dismiss for SHC, Prince Salman, and Prince Naif, while denying others.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Prince Salman | ||
| Prince Naif | ||
| Wa'el Jalaidan |
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NCB | ||
| Supreme Court | ||
| Second Circuit | ||
| Thomson Reuters | ||
| SHC | ||
| Rabita Trust | ||
| IIRO |
Timeline (1 events)
Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
→
→
to
→
→
→
→
to
Key Quotes (3)
"NCB’s reliance on Bush cannot prevail here."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017932.jpg
Quote #1
"The Supreme Court and Second Circuit agree that there are certain circumstances in which it is appropriate to give priority to the personal jurisdiction inquiry."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017932.jpg
Quote #2
"For the reasons explained above, SHC’s motion to dismiss the Ashton, Burnett, and Federal complaints for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017932.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document