DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg

1.12 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
5
Relationships
9
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.12 MB
Summary

This document, a page from a legal filing, details the contentious negotiations between federal prosecutors (led by Acosta) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Lefkowitz) regarding an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in October 2007. It describes the defense's successful request to postpone Epstein's state guilty plea and the prosecution's growing frustration with the defense for revisiting settled issues. The prosecutors also express suspicion that the defense's delay tactics were motivated by a new civil lawsuit filed against Epstein in New York.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Lefkowitz Defense Counsel
Mentioned throughout as negotiating on behalf of Epstein, discussing a breakfast meeting with Acosta, and emailing ab...
Acosta Prosecutor (presumably AUSA or U.S. Attorney)
Mentioned throughout as the lead prosecutor negotiating the NPA with Lefkowitz, agreeing to postpone Epstein's plea, ...
Sloman Prosecutor (AUSA)
A colleague of Acosta who became more involved in NPA addendum negotiations after Lourie's departure. He communicated...
Villafaña Prosecutor (AUSA)
A colleague of Acosta and Sloman involved in the NPA negotiations. She expressed concern about the reason for the del...
Epstein Defendant
The subject of the guilty plea and Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) being negotiated. His plea was postponed, and he w...
Lourie Former Prosecutor (AUSA)
Mentioned as having departed from the USAO and having previously been involved in the NPA negotiations.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
OPR government agency
Office of Professional Responsibility, to whom Acosta gave an interview about the negotiations.
USAO government agency
United States Attorney's Office, the office where Acosta, Sloman, Villafaña, and formerly Lourie worked.
State Attorney’s Office government agency
The state-level prosecutor's office that had agreed to the postponement of Epstein's guilty plea.

Timeline (5 events)

2007-10-12 to 2007-10-19
Ongoing negotiations via email and phone calls regarding the language of the NPA addendum.
2007-10-26
Original date for Epstein's entry of his guilty plea in state court, which was postponed.
state court
2007-11-20
New, postponed date for Epstein's entry of his guilty plea.
state court
circa 2007-10
A breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz to discuss the NPA.
circa 2007-10-19
A victim filed a civil lawsuit against Epstein.
New York
Epstein unnamed victim

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location where a victim had filed a civil lawsuit against Epstein.

Relationships (5)

Acosta professional (adversarial) Lefkowitz
They are on opposite sides of a criminal case (prosecution vs. defense) and are engaged in contentious negotiations over an NPA. Acosta told OPR that Lefkowitz mischaracterized his statements.
Acosta professional (colleagues) Sloman
Acosta is Sloman's superior or colleague at the USAO. Acosta solicited input from Sloman, and Sloman reported back to Acosta on negotiations and other developments.
Acosta professional (colleagues) Villafaña
They worked together at the USAO on the Epstein case. Acosta had previously instructed Villafaña on aspects of the NPA negotiations.
Sloman professional (colleagues) Villafaña
They worked together at the USAO. Sloman reported developments to Villafaña, and they shared concerns about the case.
Lefkowitz professional (lawyer-client) Epstein
Lefkowitz is described as 'defense counsel' and is negotiating a guilty plea and NPA on behalf of Epstein.

Key Quotes (9)

"several instances"
Source
— Acosta (Describing to OPR how Lefkowitz and other defense counsel mischaracterized statements made by the prosecution.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #1
"suggested revision has been rejected."
Source
— Sloman (In a report to Villafaña regarding Lefkowitz's proposed changes to the Addendum language after the breakfast meeting.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #2
"didn’t want to dictate a schedule to the state."
Source
— Acosta (A statement attributed to Acosta by Lefkowitz in an email, which Acosta later confirmed was consistent with his position.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #3
"areas of concern"
Source
— Lefkowitz (In an email to Sloman on October 19, 2007, identifying issues with a USAO proposal for the addendum.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #4
"re-ploughs some of what we accomplished this week,"
Source
— Sloman (In an email to Acosta, describing his frustration with Lefkowitz's email that revisited previously negotiated points.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #5
"unnecessary"
Source
— Sloman (In an email to Acosta, describing the issues raised by Lefkowitz.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #6
"this may be the real reason for the delay in the . . . plea. She thinks that [Epstein] . . . want[s] to knock that lawsuit out before the guilty plea to deter others."
Source
— Villafaña (reported by Sloman) (Sloman reporting Villafaña's concern to Acosta that Epstein's defense was delaying the plea to deal with a new civil lawsuit in New York.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #7
"not comfortable with requiring the State"
Source
— Acosta (Explaining why he had instructed Villafaña to omit language requiring the State Attorney's Office to act by a certain date during NPA negotiations.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #8
"we as federal prosecutors are not going to walk in and dictate to the state attorney."
Source
— Acosta (A statement made to OPR during an interview, explaining his position on dealing with the State Attorney's Office.)
DOJ-OGR-00003293.jpg
Quote #9

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document