EFTA00015277.pdf
136 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
136 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. They discuss preparation for a suppression hearing, exchange legal documents including transcripts from Judge Sweet and Magistrate Judge Netburn, and identify Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a civil plaintiff. The prosecutors also express frustration with the defense filing 12 separate memos of law (MOLs) to evade page limits.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Stan Pottinger | Lawyer |
Described as a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a civil action.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the suppression hearing and legal motions discussed.
|
| MJ Netburn | Magistrate Judge |
US Attorneys requested her decision (Exhibit I).
|
| Judge Sweet | Judge |
US Attorneys discussed seeing original application to him.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Said she would resolve suppression motions at a later time ahead of trial.
|
| McMahon | Judge (implied) |
Transcript of proceedings and her opinion mentioned.
|
| AJN | Judge (likely Alison J. Nathan) |
Referenced in subject line 'AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing'.
|
| [Redacted] | Chief, Public Corruption Unit |
Sender of the initial email requesting a meeting.
|
| [Redacted] | Associate U.S. Attorney |
Participant in the email chain.
|
Organizations (3)
Timeline (2 events)
2021-06-15
Email discussion regarding upcoming AJN/Maxwell Suppression Hearing
Southern District of New York (Email)
USANYS Attorneys
Upcoming (relative to 2021)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller
represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action
Key Quotes (4)
"Pottinger was a lawyer at Boies Schiller who represented [REDACTED], the plaintiff in the civil action."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #1
"She filed 12 (!!) separate MOLs as a way to evade the Court’s page limits. Defense attorneys have started doing that over the last few years."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #2
"Judge Nathan has said that she will resolve the suppression motions 'at a later time' ahead of trial."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #3
"We had an issue come up related to the upcoming suppression hearing... related to [REDACTED] that we'd like your thoughts on."Source
EFTA00015277.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document