Stan Pottinger
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Professional social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA-1
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Reid Weingarten
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Correspondents |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller
|
Employment |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEAN LUC BRUNEL
|
Communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Civil Plaintiff]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
AUSA [Redacted]
|
Contacted corresponded with |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Plaintiff (Redacted)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting and Contacts with Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards by AUSA [REDACTED]. | N/A | View |
| 2016-10-20 | N/A | Stan Pottinger emails Reid Weingarten regarding a news article about a lawsuit involving Trump an... | N/A | View |
| 2016-08-01 | N/A | Meeting (Aug or Sept 2016) between David Boies, Stan Pottinger, and Kramer pitching perjury charg... | SDNY Office | View |
| 2016-05-02 | N/A | Stan Pottinger spoke about Daniel Siad (referenced as 'Yesterday' in the May 3, 2016 email). | Unknown | View |
| 2016-02-29 | N/A | Meeting between Epstein victims' attorneys (Pottinger, Edwards, Skinner) and a female AUSA (likel... | SDNY Office | View |
| 2016-02-29 | Meeting | Attorneys Pete Skinner, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger met with AUSA Amanda Kramer to present i... | 1 St. Andrews Plaza USAO SDNY | View |
| 2016-02-29 | N/A | Meeting between U.S. Attorney's Office and civil attorneys (Boies, Edwards, etc.) regarding alleg... | U.S. Attorney's Office | View |
010-16.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing on April 21, 2016, in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The hearing addresses motions to admit Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell as counsel for the plaintiff, which the defense opposes citing conflicts with other litigation (Florida cases) and their status as potential witnesses. The judge also rules on various discovery disputes, including the production of Giuffre's medical records (limited to 1999-2002), tax returns (15 years ordered), and statements made to law enforcement (to be reviewed in camera).
010-06.pdf
This document is Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's second amended supplemental response to discovery requests from Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated April 29, 2016. It details Giuffre's legal representation history from 2009 to 2016, listing specific attorneys and cases including actions against Jeffrey Epstein, the US Government, and Alan Dershowitz. The document also contains objections to requests for financial records regarding payments from Epstein or media organizations, asserting attorney-client privilege and irrelevance.
EFTA00032757.pdf
This document consists of an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated June 15-16, 2021, discussing the upcoming suppression hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence addresses legal strategy, including Maxwell's filing of 12 separate memos of law to evade page limits, and clarifies the identity of Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a plaintiff in a related civil action. The emails also reference previous proceedings before Judge Sweet and Judge McMahon.
EFTA00031827.pdf
An email thread from January 2020 between Stan Pottinger and a redacted individual discussing a CNN article about a Virgin Islands lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein regarding environmental protections. The participants exchange sarcastic commentary, with the redacted individual noting Epstein as a 'world-historically appalling... polluter' and Pottinger calling the lawsuit 'nearly hilarious.' The correspondence occurs post-mortem for Epstein.
EFTA00030204.pdf
This document is an email dated July 12, 2019, sent by an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York to Stan Pottinger. The email contains an attachment titled 'government_opposition_to_bail_motion_(with_exhibits).pdf' referencing 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), indicating the transmission of legal documents related to Epstein's bail hearing.
EFTA00029499.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
EFTA00029100.pdf
This legal filing is a Reply Memorandum by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, arguing for the suppression of evidence and dismissal of charges based on government misconduct. The defense asserts that prosecutors misled Chief Judge McMahon about the extent of their prior coordination with civil attorneys (Boies Schiller Flexner) to obtain a grand jury subpoena, thereby circumventing a civil protective order. The document details a specific meeting on February 29, 2016, where civil attorneys 'pitched' the prosecution of Maxwell and provided documents, including flight records (though the specific flight data is not listed in this text), which the prosecution later failed to disclose to the judge.
EFTA00028929.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.
EFTA00028850.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing held on April 21, 2016, before Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The proceedings cover motions to admit attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell pro hac vice, which the defense contested citing potential conflicts from related Florida litigation. The hearing also addresses discovery disputes, including the production of the plaintiff's medical records, tax returns, employment history, and communications with law enforcement. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
EFTA00028482.pdf
This document is an email thread from January 2020 between Stan Pottinger and a redacted individual. Pottinger shares a CNN article about Jeffrey Epstein's environmental violations in the Virgin Islands. The recipient replies with a sarcastic remark, noting Epstein as a 'world-historically appalling . . . polluter,' seemingly downplaying the environmental charges in light of his other crimes.
EFTA00026678.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between attorney Paul Cassell (representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely a federal prosecutor). Cassell invokes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to request that Epstein be detained for the safety of the victims and to oppose any 'private jail' arrangement for Epstein's release. The recipient confirms they will convey these concerns to the Court.
EFTA00017956.pdf
This document is an email chain ending in December 2018, forwarding a May 2016 email from Stan Pottinger. In the email, Pottinger discusses Daniel Siad, stating that Jean Luc Brunel described Siad as a 'scout' or recruiter of girls and women for Jeffrey Epstein. The email originally contained an attachment with Siad's contact information provided by Brunel.
EFTA00015277.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. They discuss preparation for a suppression hearing, exchange legal documents including transcripts from Judge Sweet and Magistrate Judge Netburn, and identify Stan Pottinger as a lawyer from Boies Schiller who represented a civil plaintiff. The prosecutors also express frustration with the defense filing 12 separate memos of law (MOLs) to evade page limits.
EFTA00014499.pdf
An email dated January 3, 2019, from Stan Pottinger of Edwards Pottinger LLC regarding a confidentiality order in a legal case against Maxwell presided over by Judge Sweet. The email forwards three PDF attachments identified as a Sealed Opinion, a Protective Order, and a notice of Case Manager Assignment, with the body text noting that 'These documents are public.'
DOJ-OGR-00017745.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) documenting the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on Jane's communications regarding the Epstein case, specifically confirming that she spoke with Stan Pottinger, her ex-boyfriend Matt, and some family members. The defense attorney attempts to establish that her knowledge of the Epstein case is influenced by these conversations and press coverage.
DOJ-OGR-00003022.jpg
This legal document, filed by the prosecution, refutes the defendant's (Maxwell's) motion which alleges collusion between the law firm Boies Schiller and the U.S. Government. The prosecution argues that the defendant's narrative is false, stating that the perjury investigation began in late 2018, years after the meetings between Boies Schiller and a former AUSA, and that this AUSA had no involvement in the decision to open the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00005546.jpg
This document summarizes a conference call held on February 11, 2021, with Amanda Kramer (AK) regarding her recollections of a meeting on February 29, 2016. During the 2016 meeting, attorneys Pete Skinner, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger presented information to AK, who was then a prosecutor, advocating for the SDNY to open a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The memo details AK's limited memory of the meeting, the roles of the attorneys, and the mention of civil lawsuits, including the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031636.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 2016 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E.), attorney Reid Weingarten, and Stan Pottinger. The conversation centers on a forwarded Guardian news article regarding a rape lawsuit filed against Donald Trump, which the article notes is linked to similar allegations against Epstein. Pottinger originally sent the article to Weingarten suggesting a catch-up, and the chain indicates Weingarten forwarded it to Epstein, who replied with a snippet of the article text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031516.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 2016. Stan Pottinger emailed Reid Weingarten a link to a Guardian article about a lawsuit involving Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting they catch up soon. The next day, Weingarten forwarded this email with 'High' importance to Jeffrey Epstein at his 'jeevacation@gmail.com' address.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016200.jpg
This document is a legal declaration refuting Alan Dershowitz's public claims that he never traveled without his wife and was never alone with Epstein and young women. The declarant provides specific flight log evidence from 1998, 2004, and 2005 showing Dershowitz on flights with Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and other women, noting specifically that his wife was not listed on these manifests. The document also notes that Dershowitz had personal access to flight logs before they were turned over to law enforcement.
Unknown
Witness confirmed talking to Stan Pottinger.
RE: Jeffrey Epstein's disregard for environmental protect...
Ah yes, Jeffrey Epstein, the world-historically appalling . . . polluter.
RE: Jeffrey Epstein's disregard for environmental protect...
This lawsuit is nearly hilarious
Jeffrey Epstein's disregard for environmental protections...
Link to CNN article: https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/us/jeffrey-epstein-virgin-islands-environment/index.html
RE: Jeffrey Epstein's disregard for environmental protect...
Ah yes, Jeffrey Epstein, the world-historically appalling . . . polluter.
Jeffrey Epstein's disregard for environmental protections...
Link to CNN article: https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/16/us/jeffrey-epstein-virgin-islands-environment/index.html
docketed version
Email transmitting an attachment titled '2019-07-12, _JE, _government_opposition_to_bail_motion_(with_exhibits).pdf'.
Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape...
Shared a Guardian link and wrote: 'Hope all is well. We're due for a catch-up one day soon, you think?'
Trump lawyers given court date over lawsuit alleging rape...
Shared link to Guardian article regarding Trump/Epstein lawsuit. Message: 'Hope all is well. We're due for a catch-up one day soon, you think?'
Fwd: Contact Info Daniel Siad (from Brunel)
Yesterday I spoke of Daniel Siad, whom Jean Luc Brunel describes as a "scout" or recruiter of girls and/or women for J. Epstein. Attached to this incoming email from Brunel is the contact information he has for Siad.
Unspecified, related to the ongoing legal matters.
A phone call was made from attorney Stan Pottinger to AUSA-1 in early May 2016. AUSA-1 has no specific memory of the call and provided no notes or records of it.
re Daniel Siad
Email from Stan Pottinger to an AUSA, cc'ing Brad Edwards and Sigrid McCawley, regarding Daniel Siad.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity