DOJ-OGR-00021804.jpg

754 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 754 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) made with Epstein does not prevent the prosecution of Maxwell by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY). The document asserts that the NPA's scope was explicitly limited to the Southern District of Florida and did not bind other districts. It cites legal precedents, such as United States v. Annabi, to support the conclusion that Maxwell's prosecution can proceed.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Maxwell
Mentioned as a party in a legal case, contending that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) should bar her prosecution by...
Annabi
A party in the legal case United States v. Annabi, which is cited as a precedent.
Epstein
Mentioned as the subject of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Southern District of Florida.
Harvey
A party in the legal case United States v. Harvey, cited in a footnote.
Gebbie
A party in the legal case United States v. Gebbie, cited in a footnote.
Prisco
A party in the legal case United States v. Prisco, cited in a footnote.
Gonzalez
A party in the legal case United States v. Gonzalez, cited in a footnote.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USAO-SDNY government agency
Mentioned as the prosecuting body in Maxwell's case (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New...
Federal Bureau of Investigation government agency
Mentioned as a party to a joint investigation covered by Epstein's NPA.
United States Attorney’s Office government agency
Mentioned as a party to a joint investigation covered by Epstein's NPA.

Timeline (2 events)

Prosecution of Maxwell by the USAO-SDNY.
Southern District of New York
A joint investigation that was the subject of Epstein's NPA.

Locations (3)

Location Context
The location to which Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was expressly limited.
Location where a plea agreement was entered in the cited case of United States v. Prisco.
Location where a plea agreement was entered in the cited case of United States v. Gonzalez.

Relationships (1)

Maxwell legal Epstein
Maxwell is arguing that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein should bar her own prosecution, indicating a connection between their legal cases.

Key Quotes (2)

"After timely fulfilling all the terms and conditions of the Agreement, no prosecution for the offenses set out on pages 1 and 2 of this Agreement, nor any other offenses that have been the subject of the joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney’s Office, nor any"
Source
— Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) (A direct quote from the NPA related to Epstein, outlining the scope of non-prosecution.)
DOJ-OGR-00021804.jpg
Quote #1
"sufficiently distinct"
Source
— Legal precedent (Annabi case) (A legal standard discussed in the footnote regarding whether subsequent charges are covered by an earlier agreement.)
DOJ-OGR-00021804.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document