DOJ-OGR-00003022.jpg

723 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 723 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed by the prosecution, refutes the defendant's (Maxwell's) motion which alleges collusion between the law firm Boies Schiller and the U.S. Government. The prosecution argues that the defendant's narrative is false, stating that the perjury investigation began in late 2018, years after the meetings between Boies Schiller and a former AUSA, and that this AUSA had no involvement in the decision to open the investigation.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
The defendant in a civil lawsuit and the subject of perjury charges. She alleges collusion between Boies Schiller and...
Epstein
Mentioned as the subject of a government investigation and a meeting between AUSA-1 and attorneys from Boies Schiller.
AUSA-1 former Assistant United States Attorney
Met with lawyers from Boies Schiller about Epstein in February 2016 and received a phone call from Stan Pottinger in ...
Giuffre Plaintiff
Filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell in September 2015, represented by Boies Schiller.
Stan Pottinger Attorney
An attorney who made a phone call to AUSA-1 in early May 2016.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
New York Daily News company
The source of an article the defendant bases her allegations on.
Boies Schiller company
A law firm that allegedly colluded with the Government. Represented Giuffre in a lawsuit against Maxwell and met with...
The Government government agency
Refers to the U.S. Government, which allegedly colluded with Boies Schiller and later opened an investigation leading...
United States Attorney government agency
The office where AUSA-1 was formerly employed.

Timeline (5 events)

2015-09
Giuffre, represented by Boies Schiller, filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell.
Southern District of New York
2016-02
Boies Schiller met with the Government to urge an investigation of Epstein and Maxwell.
2016-02
AUSA-1 met with a lawyer from Boies Schiller and two other attorneys about Epstein.
AUSA-1 lawyer from Boies Schiller two other attorneys
Summer of 2016
Boies Schiller met with the Government again to ask if they would consider charging the defendant with perjury.
late 2018
An investigation was opened that led to the Indictment for perjury.

Locations (1)

Location Context
The location where Giuffre filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell.

Relationships (4)

Giuffre adversarial Maxwell
Giuffre filed a civil defamation lawsuit against Maxwell.
Giuffre professional Boies Schiller
The law firm Boies Schiller represented Giuffre in her lawsuit.
Boies Schiller professional The Government
The law firm met with the Government in February and summer of 2016 regarding Epstein and Maxwell.
Stan Pottinger professional AUSA-1
Pottinger, an attorney, placed a phone call to AUSA-1, a government attorney, in May 2016.

Key Quotes (2)

"precise[] design[]"
Source
— The defendant (Maxwell) (Used to describe the alleged collusion between Boies Schiller and the Government.)
DOJ-OGR-00003022.jpg
Quote #1
"charged with perjury."
Source
— The defendant (Maxwell) (The alleged goal of the collusion between Boies Schiller and the Government.)
DOJ-OGR-00003022.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document