AUSA-1
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Stan Pottinger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stanley Pottinger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | Employment change | AUSA-1 left the USAO-SDNY. | USAO-SDNY | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | AUSA-1 met with a lawyer from Boies Schiller and two other attorneys about Epstein. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Attorneys met with AUSA-1 to discuss individuals who worked for Epstein, focusing on Maxwell. The... | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Meeting between AUSA-1 and Boies Schiller which resulted in no action by USAO-SDNY. | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00003052.jpg
This document page is from a government filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), arguing that the prosecution did not improperly use civil discovery materials or mislead the court. The government distinguishes its actions from the 'Chemical Bank' precedent, noting that while AUSA-1 met with the law firm Boies Schiller in February 2016, no action was taken then, and the actual investigation began in November 2018 independent of improper influence.
DOJ-OGR-00003026.jpg
This court document outlines the procedural history of the civil litigation between Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell, including deposition dates in 2016 and a settlement in 2017. It details how the USAO-SDNY formally opened its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators in late November 2018, explicitly crediting Julie K. Brown's reporting in the Miami Herald as the catalyst. The document also clarifies that a specific prosecutor, 'AUSA-1', was not involved in opening this 2018 investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00003025.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, recounts events from 2016 concerning the civil litigation between Giuffre and Maxwell. It details the process of establishing a protective order for discovery materials, initiated by Maxwell's motion on March 2, 2016, contested by Giuffre's counsel (Boies Schiller), and ultimately entered by Judge Robert W. Sweet on March 18, 2016. The document also asserts that the USAO-SDNY did not open an investigation into Epstein or Maxwell in 2016 and that the government has no record of email communication between AUSA-1 and Boies Schiller attorneys after May 3, 2016.
DOJ-OGR-00003024.jpg
This legal document describes a February 2016 meeting where attorneys presented information to an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA-1) about individuals connected to Epstein, with a focus on Maxwell. It asserts that because this meeting pre-dated the depositions central to the current indictment, the attorneys could not have alleged perjury related to those specific depositions at that time. The document also notes AUSA-1's lack of recall regarding specific perjury discussions involving Maxwell and details the government's subsequent review of AUSA-1's emails for related communications.
DOJ-OGR-00003022.jpg
This legal document, filed by the prosecution, refutes the defendant's (Maxwell's) motion which alleges collusion between the law firm Boies Schiller and the U.S. Government. The prosecution argues that the defendant's narrative is false, stating that the perjury investigation began in late 2018, years after the meetings between Boies Schiller and a former AUSA, and that this AUSA had no involvement in the decision to open the investigation.
Unknown
AUSA-1 does not recall the details of a conversation, and the Government is not aware of any records documenting its substance.
No Subject
After a February 2016 meeting, AUSA-1 received a limited number of emails from the attorneys.
No Subject
An email dated May 3, 2016, from Pottinger to AUSA-1, which appears to suggest they spoke by telephone the previous day.
Unknown matter
The Government has not identified any records suggesting AUSA-1 communicated via email with attorneys at Boies Schiller regarding this matter after May 3, 2016.
No Subject
A potential telephone conversation on or about May 2, 2016, suggested by an email from Pottinger.
Unspecified, related to the ongoing legal matters.
A phone call was made from attorney Stan Pottinger to AUSA-1 in early May 2016. AUSA-1 has no specific memory of the call and provided no notes or records of it.
Unknown/Investigation
Meeting occurred, but USAO-SDNY took no action as a result.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity