010-16.pdf
169 KB
Extraction Summary
13
People
5
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (hearing)
File Size:
169 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript of a court hearing on April 21, 2016, in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The hearing addresses motions to admit Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell as counsel for the plaintiff, which the defense opposes citing conflicts with other litigation (Florida cases) and their status as potential witnesses. The judge also rules on various discovery disputes, including the production of Giuffre's medical records (limited to 1999-2002), tax returns (15 years ordered), and statements made to law enforcement (to be reviewed in camera).
People (13)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia L. Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Seeking to add counsel (Cassell, Edwards) to her legal team; subject of defense discovery requests regarding medical ...
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Opposing pro hac vice motions; scheduled for deposition the following day (April 22, 2016).
|
| Robert W. Sweet | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing in SDNY; ruling on discovery and pro hac vice motions.
|
| Sigrid Stone McCawley | Attorney for Plaintiff |
Arguing for admission of Cassell and Edwards; arguing against broad production of medical records and tax returns.
|
| Brad Edwards | Attorney for Plaintiff |
Seeking pro hac vice admission; subject of defense objection due to involvement in Florida litigation; clarifies Flor...
|
| Paul G. Cassell | Attorney for Plaintiff |
Law professor seeking pro hac vice admission; subject of defense objection.
|
| Laura A. Menninger | Attorney for Defendant |
Arguing for production of medical records, tax returns, and retainer agreements; claims plaintiff has 'flashbacks' an...
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Attorney for Defendant |
Objecting to pro hac vice motions of Edwards/Cassell, claiming they are potential witnesses and have conflicts.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Mentioned |
Referenced regarding settlement agreement, prior abuse allegations, and ongoing criminal investigation.
|
| Stan Pottinger | Attorney/Author |
Mentioned as a lawyer of renown and author affiliated with plaintiff, whose retainer agreement defense seeks.
|
| Alan Dershowitz | Witness (Mentioned) |
His deposition is mentioned as being produced under confidentiality.
|
| Rothstein | Mentioned |
Mentioned in case name 'Edwards v. Epstein and Rothstein'.
|
| Dr. Olsen | Medical Provider |
Noticed for deposition in Colorado.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2016-04-21
Court Hearing regarding Pro Hac Vice motions and discovery disputes.
SDNY Courtroom
2016-04-22
Scheduled deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Unknown
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (4)
Edwards seeking pro hac vice admission to represent Giuffre.
Virginia Giuffre
→
Attorney-Client
→
Paul Cassell
Cassell seeking pro hac vice admission to represent Giuffre.
Plaintiff alleges sexual abuse by Epstein during 1999-2002 period.
Plaintiff suing Defendant for defamation regarding abuse allegations.
Key Quotes (6)
"This case is about the plaintiff's false allegations."Source
010-16.pdf
Quote #1
"These are the lawyers that wrote the false allegations."Source
010-16.pdf
Quote #2
"I can't believe that this entire testimony is going to be confidential. Honestly, you all are too much."Source
010-16.pdf
Quote #3
"What do I know about Florida except that it's flat and hot."Source
010-16.pdf
Quote #4
"The medical records of the period '99 to 2002 will be produced and the plaintiff will indicate whether that production is complete..."Source
010-16.pdf
Quote #5
"Anything that has been submitted to any law enforcement officer by the plaintiff I will take in camera."Source
010-16.pdf
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document