024.pdf
168 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
7
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal notice / court filing
File Size:
168 KB
Summary
This document is a legal notice filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida regarding a subpoena served on Bradley J. Edwards. Maxwell argues that rulings made by the Southern District of New York on a similar subpoena served on Paul Cassell (another attorney for Virginia Giuffre) should be binding (res judicata) on the Edwards subpoena. The filing includes a table comparing the requests in both subpoenas and the corresponding rulings from the SDNY court, asking the Florida court to issue a consistent order requiring production of certain documents and granting the motion to quash for others.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Denise D. Riley | Attorney |
Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, Riley Law PLLC
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant in underlying case and filer of the notice
|
| Virginia L. Giuffre | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in underlying case
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Subpoena Target / Attorney |
Subject of the subpoena duces tecum; attorney for Giuffre
|
| Paul Cassell | Subpoena Target / Attorney |
Attorney for Giuffre who received a similar subpoena
|
| Jack Scarola | Attorney |
Attorney for Bradley J. Edwards
|
| Nicole Simmons | Signatory |
Signed the Certificate of Service
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where this document is filed
|
|
| Riley Law PLLC |
Law firm of Denise D. Riley
|
|
| Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. |
Law firm of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
|
| Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. |
Law firm of Jack Scarola
|
|
| Victims Refuse Silence |
Third party mentioned in footnote regarding document production
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Court where underlying action is pending and rulings were made
|
|
| District Court for the District of Utah |
Court that transferred the Cassell Motion to Quash to SDNY
|
Timeline (2 events)
2016-08-30
Ruling on the Cassell Motion to Quash issued by the Southern District of New York
Southern District of New York
2017-03
Scheduled trial date for the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell)
Southern District of New York
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Riley Law PLLC
|
|
|
Address of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
|
|
Address of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
|
Relationships (3)
Document refers to Edwards as one of Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's attorneys.
Document refers to Cassell as 'one of Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre other attorneys'.
Maxwell served a Subpoena Duces Tecum on Edwards which Edwards moved to quash.
Key Quotes (4)
"Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”) files this notice of her position respecting the Subpoena Duces Tecum to Bradly Edwards and a Related Ruling in the underlying Action"Source
024.pdf
Quote #1
"It is Ms. Maxwell’s position that the rulings made by the Court in the Southern District of New York are res judicata on the Edwards Subpoena with respect to the identical requests in the Cassell Subpoena"Source
024.pdf
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell believes that the Court Should issue an Order consistent with the binding determinations of the Court in which the underlying case is pending on identical issues."Source
024.pdf
Quote #3
"Ms. Maxwell does not seek a second production of documents that have already been produced in this matter, including those already produced third parties Mr. Cassell or Victims Refuse Silence."Source
024.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document