DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg

804 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
6
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 804 KB
Summary

This document is a legal filing, specifically page 3 of a 'Motion to Intervene' in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on August 27, 2019. The filer, identified as the Intervenor/Relator, outlines a timeline of legal actions against the USDOJ and Bill Barr, alleging a conspiracy, fraud, and the monopolization of the judiciary. The filer connects their case to the Jeffrey Epstein case, citing the concept of "prosecutorial discretion" and argues for their right to intervene based on legal precedent where a third party's constitutional rights are implicated.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Alex Acosta
Mentioned in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein case and the exercise of "prosecutorial discretion" by the USDOJ.
Jeffrey Epstein
His case is cited as an example of USDOJ's "prosecutorial discretion." His removal from suicide watch and subsequent ...
Donald Ayer former Deputy Attorney General of the United States
Author of an article attached by the Intervenor, which described Bill Barr as a “fierce advocate of unchecked preside...
Bill Barr
Subject of a quo warranto petition filed by the Relator for fraud, perjury, and treason.
DAVID GOLDEN
Name and address listed at the bottom of the document, likely the filer of the motion.
Collyard
Named party in the case citation United States v. Collyard.
Carmichael
Named party in the case citation United States v. Carmichael.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
USDOJ government agency
The United States Department of Justice is the subject of a quo warranto petition for fraud, obstruction, and perjury...
District Ct. government agency
The District Court is mentioned as having dismissed the Intervenor's petition, refused to vacate its decision, and ha...
Freemasonry fraternal organization
Identified by the Intervenor as part of a conspiracy reported to the District Court.
Rotary service organization
Identified by the Intervenor as part of a conspiracy reported to the District Court.
9th Circuit government agency
Mentioned in relation to a mediation form sent by the Intervenor to USDOJ attorneys.

Timeline (6 events)

2019-05-15
Intervenor's petition for quo warranto against USDOJ was dismissed as “moot”.
Intervenor USDOJ
2019-06-06
Intervenor identified a conspiracy (Freemasonry/Rotary) to the District Ct.
District Ct.
Intervenor
2019-06-26
The District Court refused to vacate its decision and threatened the Intervenor with sanctions if the Relator appealed. The Relator appealed.
District Ct.
Intervenor Relator District Court
2019-07-27
Intervenor sent USDOJ attorneys the 9th Circuit mediation form.
Intervenor USDOJ attorneyz
2019-07-29
According to newspaper reports, Jeffrey Epstein was taken off suicide watch.
2019-08-10
According to newspaper reports, Jeffrey Epstein was found dead.

Locations (3)

Location Context
Address listed for DAVID GOLDEN at the end of the document.
District of Minnesota, mentioned in the case citation for United States v. Collyard.
Middle District of Alabama, mentioned in the case citation for United States v. Carmichael.

Relationships (3)

Intervenor/Relator adversarial (legal) USDOJ
The Intervenor/Relator filed a petition for quo warranto against the USDOJ for fraud, obstruction, and perjury.
Intervenor/Relator adversarial (legal) Bill Barr
The Relator filed a petition of quo warranto against Bill Barr for fraud, perjury, and treason.
USDOJ professional Alex Acosta
The document states that the same "prosecutorial discretion" was exercised by both USDOJ and Alex Acosta in the Jeffrey Epstein case, implying a shared legal approach or collaboration.

Key Quotes (4)

"moot"
Source
— District Court (Used to describe the reason for dismissing the Intervenor's petition for quo warranto.)
DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg
Quote #1
"prosecutorial discretion"
Source
— Intervenor (describing USDOJ's actions) (Used to describe the USDOJ's power to fraudulently dismiss False Claims complaints, and is compared to the discretion used in the Jeffrey Epstein case.)
DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg
Quote #2
"fierce advocate of unchecked presidential power"
Source
— Donald Ayer (A quote from an article by Donald Ayer, describing Bill Barr.)
DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg
Quote #3
"have been granted in limited circumstances where ‘a third party’s constitutional or other federal rights are implicated by the resolution of a particular motion, request, or other issue during the course of a criminal case.’"
Source
— United States v. Collyard case opinion (A legal standard for intervention in criminal matters, quoted to support the argument for intervention.)
DOJ-OGR-00000635.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document