DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
782 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
6
Organizations
4
Locations
5
Events
6
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
782 KB
Summary
This legal document is a page from a court's analysis distinguishing the current defendant's case from several cited legal precedents regarding pre-trial detention. The court contrasts cases where defendants were released (Khashoggi, Bodmer) with cases where they were detained (Boustani, Ho, Epstein), focusing on factors that justify detention such as flight risk, substantial financial resources, dual citizenship, and ties to foreign countries without extradition treaties like Brazil.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Khashoggi | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Khashoggi, 717 F. Supp. 1048.
|
| Bodmer | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Bodmer, No. 03 Cr. 947 (SAS).
|
| Boustani | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Boustani, 356 F. Supp. 3d 246.
|
| Patrick Ho | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Patrick Ho, 17 Cr. 779 (KBF).
|
| Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Epstein, 155 F. Supp. 2d 323.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Judicial body |
The judicial body conducting the analysis in the main, un-cited case.
|
| United States Government | Government agency |
Referred to as 'Government', it is the prosecuting party in the cited legal cases.
|
| S.D.N.Y. | Court |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which heard the Khashoggi, Bodmer, and Patrick Ho cases.
|
| E.D.N.Y. | Court |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, which heard the Boustani case.
|
| 2d Cir. | Court |
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which affirmed the Boustani decision.
|
| E.D. Pa. | Court |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, which heard the Epstein case.
|
Timeline (5 events)
1989
United States v. Khashoggi, where the defendant was released pending trial after waiving extradition rights and his government committed to ensuring his appearance.
S.D.N.Y.
2001
United States v. Epstein, where factors like dual citizenship (Germany and Brazil), lack of an extradition treaty with Brazil, and substantial assets weighed in favor of detention.
E.D. Pa.
2004-06-28
United States v. Bodmer, where bail was set for a defendant who had consented to extradition, with the court finding the government's argument about financial resources was speculative.
S.D.N.Y.
2018-02-04
United States v. Patrick Ho, where the defendant was ordered detained based on risk of flight, strength of evidence, and ties to foreign jurisdictions.
S.D.N.Y.
2019-03-07
United States v. Boustani, where the defendant was ordered detained pending trial due to risk of flight based on several factors including access to financial resources and ties to foreign countries.
E.D.N.Y.
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the Khashoggi case, where the defendant waived his right to appeal extradition.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the destination for arraignment and trial in several cited cases.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a country of dual citizenship for the defendant Epstein.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a country of dual citizenship for the defendant Epstein and for its lack of an extradition treaty.
|
Relationships (6)
Cited case United States v. Khashoggi.
Cited case United States v. Bodmer.
Cited case United States v. Boustani.
Cited case United States v. Patrick Ho.
Cited case United States v. Epstein.
The document states that 'defendant and his wife owned “substantial” property'.
Key Quotes (6)
"based, in large part, on speculation"Source
— Court in United States v. Bodmer
(Describing the government's argument regarding the defendant's financial resources.)
DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
Quote #1
"failed to meet its burden"Source
— Court in United States v. Bodmer
(The court's finding regarding the government's argument for detention.)
DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
Quote #2
"minimal"Source
— Court in United States v. Boustani
(Describing the defendant's ties to the United States.)
DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
Quote #3
"extensive ties to foreign countries without extradition"Source
— Court in United States v. Boustani
(A factor supporting the defendant's detention due to flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
Quote #4
"potential ties in foreign jurisdictions"Source
— Court in United States v. Patrick Ho
(A factor supporting the defendant's detention due to flight risk.)
DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
Quote #5
"substantial"Source
— Court in United States v. Epstein
(Describing the property and assets owned by the defendant and his wife.)
DOJ-OGR-00001173.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document