HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022306.jpg

4.02 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

0
People
20
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Federal register publication
File Size: 4.02 MB
Summary

This document from the Federal Register discusses the implications of an employer's failure to post required notices under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It addresses the tolling of the statute of limitations for filing unfair labor practice charges, particularly debating whether union-represented employees should be treated differently from non-union employees. The text also considers whether a failure to post can be used as evidence of an employer's unlawful antiunion motive.

Organizations (20)

Name Type Context
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
Fisher & Phillips LLC
National Grocers Association
Coalition for a Democratic Workplace
COLLE
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
American Trucking Associations
Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
California Chamber
NCAE
Georgetown University
AFL-CIO
Fifth Circuit
Group Med. & Surgical Serv.
John Morrell & Co.
Ritz-Carlton San Juan Hotel
Leiser Construction, LLC
Shearer’s Foods
Ferguson-Williams, Inc.
Champion Rivet Co.

Locations (1)

Location Context

Relationships (4)

Key Quotes (3)

"ignorance of the law is no excuse."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022306.jpg
Quote #1
"The failure to post a required notice "vitiates the normal assumption that an employee is aware of his rights.""
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022306.jpg
Quote #2
"The Board finds some merit in both sets of contentions. On the one hand, it is reasonable to assume that employees who are represented by unions are more likely to be aware of their NLRA rights than unrepresented employees."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022306.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document