U.S. Chamber of Commerce
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
National Labor Relations Board
|
Opposed rule aspect |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)
|
Adversarial in rulemaking context |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Commenter on proposed rule |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Board (NLRB)
|
Regulatory commenter |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) conducted a public comment period for a proposed employ... | United States | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015055.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a satirical essay, story, or manuscript found within House Oversight evidence files (stamped 015055). The text adopts a simplistic 'Dick and Jane' narrative style to critique New York divorce laws, specifically the requirement of proving adultery and the ruling by Justice Benjamin Brenner regarding the legality of raiding private residences versus hotels. It concludes with a satirical comparison of divorce-seekers in Alabama to the 'Freedom Riders' of the Civil Rights era.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024581.jpg
This document creates a management profile for a company called KUE, likely part of a larger offering memorandum or business proposal. It details the biographies of the three principals: Michael Milken (Chairman), Steven Green (Vice Chairman), and Lowell Milken (CEO), highlighting their philanthropic work, past business leadership (Samsonite, Heron International), and government service (Green's ambassadorship). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029488.jpg
This document is page 13 of a 'Business Expansion Portfolio and Prospectus' for Twin City Care of The Virgin Islands (also referred to as Twin City Mobile Integrated Health Services). It outlines operational procedures for after-hours calls, the compensation structure for the billing director (salary plus commission), and a Public Relations strategy focused on three types of 'customers': patients, facilities, and staff. It also details plans to align with local organizations (casinos, hotels, cruise lines) and professional associations, while introducing 'Community Paramedicine' to serve rural populations and reduce 911 misuse. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022306.jpg
This document from the Federal Register discusses the implications of an employer's failure to post required notices under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It addresses the tolling of the statute of limitations for filing unfair labor practice charges, particularly debating whether union-represented employees should be treated differently from non-union employees. The text also considers whether a failure to post can be used as evidence of an employer's unlawful antiunion motive.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, discussing a rule by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) concerning the statute of limitations for unfair labor practice claims. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022305' suggests it was cataloged as an exhibit for a congressional committee. The content of the document itself is purely about U.S. labor law and contains no information, names, or events related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022303.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register, dated August 30, 2011, in which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) justifies its rule that an employer's failure to post a notice of employee rights is an unfair labor practice. The Board refutes arguments from various business and legal organizations that it is overstepping its authority, citing Supreme Court precedent for its interpretive flexibility and drawing parallels to similar notice requirements under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The document is part of a legal and administrative record and is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022301.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on posting employee rights notices. It discusses the Board's decisions on public comments concerning electronic posting methods, compliance with Department of Labor rules, and exemptions for certain employers. The document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is strictly related to U.S. labor law and regulatory procedure, and the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022301' likely indicates it was collected as an exhibit for a congressional committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022300.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing a final rule from the National Labor Relations Board. The rule establishes employer obligations for posting notices of employee rights, focusing on requirements for foreign language translations, accessibility for vision-impaired and illiterate employees, and electronic posting. Despite the user's prompt, this document's content is strictly related to U.S. labor law and contains no information whatsoever about Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022292.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) response to public comments on a proposed employee rights notice. The Board addresses and refutes or incorporates feedback from organizations like COLLE, ALFA, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce regarding the language on collective bargaining, the right to strike, and the right to refrain from union activity. The document has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and is strictly related to U.S. labor law and regulatory procedure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022290.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing public comments on a proposed National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule requiring employers to post a notice of employee rights. It outlines the divided feedback, with unions and employee advocates praising the notice for its clarity, while employer groups and conservative organizations criticized it as unbalanced, pro-union, and an oversimplification of complex labor law. The document has no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and is solely focused on U.S. labor regulations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022285.jpg
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, in which the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) defends its legal authority to implement a rule requiring employers to post notices of employee rights. The Board refutes arguments from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other organizations by distinguishing the proposed rule from Supreme Court precedents like Teamsters 357 and Lechmere. The document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein; it is a legal analysis of U.S. labor law.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity