HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
3.22 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
8
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal exhibit / law review article extract
File Size:
3.22 MB
Summary
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The text discusses legal theories regarding the judicial and administrative review of decisions *not* to charge (prosecutorial discretion), contrasting the lack of such mechanisms in the U.S. with their prevalence in the E.U. and England. This legal argument is relevant to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case and the rights of his victims.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Attorney |
Name appears in the footer, indicating he submitted this document, likely as part of a legal filing or congressional ...
|
| Frazer McCallum | Author |
Cited in footnote regarding the Scottish Criminal Justice System.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minnesota Law Review |
Source of the text (103 Minn. L. Rev. 844).
|
|
| European Union |
Referenced regarding directives and member state laws.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524'.
|
|
| European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights |
Cited in footnote 72.
|
|
| Council of Europe |
Cited in footnote 72 regarding recommendations.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (8)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Referenced in comparison to EU laws.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding legal systems.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding legal systems and specific acts.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding legal systems.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding legal systems.
|
|
|
Referenced regarding legal systems.
|
|
|
Referenced in footnotes.
|
|
|
Referenced in footnotes (OPP Annual Report).
|
Key Quotes (2)
"A second structure that creates some redundant authority over decisions not to prosecute exposes those prosecutorial decisions to review, either by courts or by supervising officials within an administrative hierarchy."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
Quote #1
"Pursuant to an E.U. Directive, twenty-five of the twenty-eight member states of the European Union grant crime victims formal rights to seek review of decisions not to file criminal charges based on their complaints."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document