DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
566 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
566 KB
Summary
This is a letter dated February 21, 2008, from attorney Theodore J. Leopold to attorney Jack A. Goldberger regarding the case of 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'. Leopold expresses serious ethical concerns about Goldberger's co-counsel, who refused to provide copies of exhibits to Leopold and the State Attorney during a direct examination the previous day. Leopold writes to confirm an agreement that Goldberger will now provide copies of all exhibits used.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Theodore J. Leopold | Attorney |
Sender of the letter, from the law firm Ricci Leopold.
|
| Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. | Attorney |
Recipient of the letter, from the law firm Atterbury, Goldberger, et al.
|
| Michael Tein, Esq. | Attorney |
Copied (cc) on the letter.
|
| Lanna Belohlavek, Esq. | Attorney |
Copied (cc) on the letter.
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Mentioned in the 'Re:' line as a party in the case 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'.
|
| Epstein | Defendant |
Mentioned in the 'Re:' line as a party in the case 'Jane Doe v. Epstein'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| RICCI LEOPOLD, P.A. | law firm |
The law firm of the sender, Theodore J. Leopold, as shown on the letterhead.
|
| Atterbury, Goldberger, et al | law firm |
The law firm of the recipient, Jack A. Goldberger.
|
| State Attorney | government agency |
Mentioned as a party that was denied copies of documents and photographs during a direct examination.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2008-02-20
A direct examination took place where Jack Goldberger's co-counsel refused to provide copies of documents and photographs used as exhibits and refused to allow the court reporter to mark them.
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The address of Jack A. Goldberger's law firm.
|
|
|
The city and state of Jack A. Goldberger's law firm.
|
|
|
The address of the Ricci Leopold law firm, listed in the footer.
|
|
|
The city and state of the Ricci Leopold law firm.
|
Relationships (1)
Leopold is writing to Goldberger as a fellow attorney regarding a professional and ethical issue with Goldberger's co-counsel in the 'Jane Doe v. Epstein' case.
Key Quotes (3)
"This letter is written due to the deep and serious concern about the ethics of your co-counsel."Source
— Theodore J. Leopold
(Opening sentence of the letter, stating its purpose.)
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
Quote #1
"Because your co-counsel refused to provide copies of the documents and photographs used in his direct examination of [REDACTED] yesterday to the State Attorney or me... I am quite fearful we may never see the exhibits again."Source
— Theodore J. Leopold
(Explaining the reason for the letter and the concern over the co-counsel's actions.)
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
Quote #2
"Therefore I am compelled to write this letter to confirm that you have agreed that you will provide the State Attorney and me copies of all the exhibits, properly identified, that were used during the direct examination."Source
— Theodore J. Leopold
(Stating the action required from Jack Goldberger to resolve the issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00031537.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document