040.pdf

141 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal notice (notice of reliance)
File Size: 141 KB
Summary

This document is a 'Notice of Reliance' filed on June 19, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CIV-80469) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team informs the court that despite the Plaintiff filing an Amended Memorandum of Law on June 12, 2009, Epstein will not file a new supplemental reply but will instead rely on his previous arguments filed on June 1, 2009. The document outlines the procedural history of the motion to dismiss and includes a certificate of service listing attorneys for both parties.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Defendant in Case No. 09-CIV-80469
Jane Doe II Plaintiff
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CIV-80469
Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Florida Bar No. 224162
Michael J. Pike Attorney
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Florida Bar #617296
Isidro M. Garcia Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff
Jack Alan Goldberger Attorney
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of Florida
Court where the case is filed
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
Firm representing the Plaintiff
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
Firm representing the Defendant
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
Firm representing the Defendant

Timeline (5 events)

2009-05-09
Defendant Epstein filed Motion to Dismiss (DE 13)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
2009-05-22
Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition (DE 20)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
2009-06-01
Defendant Epstein filed Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum (DE 31)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
2009-06-12
Court Hearing where Plaintiff's counsel stated he would withdraw certain claims
US District Court Southern District of Florida
Counsel for Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant
2009-06-12
Plaintiff filed Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition (DE 36)
US District Court Southern District of Florida

Locations (5)

Location Context
Jurisdiction
Location of legal firms involved
Address for Isidro M. Garcia
Address for Jack Alan Goldberger
Address for Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman

Relationships (3)

Jeffrey Epstein Adversarial Jane Doe II
Defendant and Plaintiff in lawsuit Case 9:09-cv-80469
Robert D. Critton, Jr. Legal Counsel Jeffrey Epstein
Signed as Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Jack Alan Goldberger Legal Counsel Jeffrey Epstein
Listed as Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

Key Quotes (2)

"Defendant, EPSTEIN, stands on those arguments set forth in DE 31 and, therefore, will not be filing an additional supplemental reply."
Source
040.pdf
Quote #1
"After a hearing on June 12, 2009, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, stated he would withdraw certain claims in Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s initial Memorandum of Law"
Source
040.pdf
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document