DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
958 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Government report (opr - office of professional responsibility)
File Size:
958 KB
Summary
This document is page 187 of an OPR report (filed in 2021/2023 court cases) analyzing former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. The report concludes that Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' by pursuing a state-based resolution and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) without adequate consideration or team consultation, allowing Epstein to manipulate the process. It highlights that the decision left victims, the public, and federal agents (FBI and line AUSAs) dissatisfied with the justice achieved.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander Acosta | U.S. Attorney |
Subject of the OPR investigation; criticized for exercising poor judgment regarding the Epstein NPA.
|
| Villafaña | Prosecutor/AUSA |
Mentioned as lacking experience with the state court system alongside other subjects.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Described as being able to 'manipulate the process to his benefit' due to the NPA's provisions.
|
| Acosta's Attorney | Legal Counsel |
Quoted in footnote 259 acknowledging the matter needed more consistent staffing.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| OPR |
Office of Professional Responsibility; the body conducting the investigation and issuing the report.
|
|
| USAO |
United States Attorney's Office; the office handling the Epstein investigation.
|
|
| FBI |
Mentioned regarding 'FBI case agents' being dissatisfied with the result.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Referred to as 'the Department'; the standard against which Acosta's judgment was measured.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unknown (Historical context: approx 2007-2008)
Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA)
Florida (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction where the case was pushed, which the report notes the federal team lacked experience with.
|
Relationships (2)
Villafaña mentioned as a subject under Acosta's leadership lacking specific state court experience.
Acosta led the office prosecuting Epstein; report criticizes the resulting NPA.
Key Quotes (5)
"OPR did not find evidence indicating that such a meeting or discussion with the full team was held before the decision was made to pursue the state-based resolution"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
Quote #1
"As Acosta later recognized and told OPR, 'And a question that I think is a valid one in my mind is, did the focus on, let’s just get this done and get a jail term, mean that we didn’t take a step back and say, let’s evaluate how this train is moving?'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
Quote #2
"Many features of the NPA were given inadequate consideration... with the result that Epstein was able to manipulate the process to his benefit."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
Quote #3
"[I]f I was advising a fellow U.S. Attorney today, I would say, think it through."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
Quote #4
"OPR concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in that he chose a course of action that was in marked contrast to the action that the Department would reasonably expect an attorney exercising good judgment to take."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021387.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document