028.pdf

358 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size: 358 KB
Summary

This document is a letter from attorney Bradley J. Edwards to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al., dated November 12, 2019. Edwards opposes the Defendants' request for a two-week extension to respond to the complaint, arguing that they have already been granted a 45-day extension and that the upcoming Rule 26(f) conference should proceed. The letter notes that the Defendants' delay is related to a filing in the U.S. Virgin Islands regarding a 'claims resolution program' for the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, which the Plaintiff argues should not halt the current litigation.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Bradley J. Edwards Attorney
Plaintiff's counsel, author of the letter, partner at Edwards Pottinger LLC.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Recipient of the letter, presiding judge at United States Courthouse.
VE Plaintiff
The plaintiff in the case VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et al.
Jeffrey E. Epstein Deceased Subject
Mentioned in relation to his Estate and a 'claims resolution program' in the US Virgin Islands.
Seth M. Lehrman Attorney
Listed on letterhead.
Brittany N. Henderson Attorney
Listed on letterhead.
Matthew D. Weissing Attorney
Listed on letterhead.
J. Stanley Pottinger Attorney
Listed on letterhead (New York Office).

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Edwards Pottinger LLC
Law firm representing the Plaintiff.
United States District Court
Southern District of New York (implied by Foley Square address).
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
Mentioned as the subject of proceedings in the US Virgin Islands.
Nine East 71st Street
Defendant entity in the case caption.

Timeline (4 events)

2019-08-20
Plaintiff filed her complaint.
Court
VE
2019-09-10
Counsel for Defendants agreed to accept service of Plaintiff's complaint.
N/A
Counsel for Defendants
2019-11-15
Current deadline for Defendants to respond to complaint and deadline for Rule 26(f) conference.
N/A
Plaintiff Defendants
2019-12-06
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
Court
Plaintiff Defendants Court

Locations (3)

Location Context
United States Courthouse address.
Edwards Pottinger LLC Florida office address.
Location of a court regarding the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Relationships (2)

VE Attorney-Client Bradley J. Edwards
We represent Plaintiff VE in the above-captioned action.
Case caption implies Nine East 71st Street is a defendant; body mentions proceedings relating to the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.

Key Quotes (4)

"Plaintiff does not believe that the use of any alternative dispute resolution mechanism should stay or modify the course of litigation in this matter."
Source
028.pdf
Quote #1
"Defendants represented to Plaintiff that the need for further extension arises from Defendants’ intent to file a pleading in a Court in the United States Virgin Islands relating to the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, which will provide information on a 'claims resolution program.'"
Source
028.pdf
Quote #2
"Plaintiff intends to issue discovery and begin taking depositions as soon as permitted..."
Source
028.pdf
Quote #3
"...it is certainly not the first request for extension nor the first extension as Plaintiff has already graciously provided Defendants with a forty-five (45) day extension..."
Source
028.pdf
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document