DOJ-OGR-00000005.jpg
723 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court opinion / appellate document
File Size:
723 KB
Summary
This page from a legal document outlines the issues presented on appeal regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, including arguments concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and juror impartiality. The court summarizes its holdings, stating that the NPA did not bind the prosecution in New York, the statute of limitations was not violated, and the motion for a new trial based on juror conduct was properly denied.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | ||
| Maxwell |
Timeline (3 events)
Maxwell’s prosecution
Appeal
Second superseding indictment of March 29, 2021
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
→
→
Key Quotes (2)
"We hold that Epstein’s NPA did not bar Maxwell’s prosecution by USAO-SDNY as the NPA does not bind USAO-SDNY."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000005.jpg
Quote #1
"We hold that Maxwell’s Indictment complied with the statute of limitations as 18 U.S.C. § 3283 extended the time to bring charges of sexual abuse for offenses committed before the date of the statute’s enactment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000005.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document