EFTA00015303.pdf
1.16 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal memorandum / motion to suppress and dismiss
File Size:
1.16 MB
Summary
This document is a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to a third party (name redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment. The defense argues that the subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment due to overbreadth and lack of a warrant, violated the 'Martindell' doctrine regarding the sanctity of protective orders in civil litigation, and infringed upon Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination regarding her 2016 civil deposition testimony.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Seeking to suppress evidence and dismiss counts 5 and 6.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Maxwell, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C.
|
| Laura A. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Maxwell, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C.
|
| Mark S. Cohen | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Maxwell, Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Maxwell, Cohen & Gresser LLP.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Attorney for Maxwell, Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
|
| Alison J. Nathan (AJN) | Judge |
Presiding Judge indicated in the case caption (20 Cr. 330 (AJN)).
|
| Judge Sweet | Judge |
Judge in the civil defamation action who ordered the return/destruction of confidential information.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue for the criminal case.
|
|
| United States of America |
Prosecuting party.
|
|
| Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. |
Defense counsel firm (Denver).
|
|
| Cohen & Gresser LLP |
Defense counsel firm (New York).
|
|
| U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY |
Recipient of service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2016
Civil defamation action settlement (settled before trial).
Unknown
Ghislaine Maxwell
Plaintiffs (implied)
2021-01-25
Filing of Memorandum in Support of Motion to Suppress and Dismiss.
SDNY Court
Ghislaine Maxwell
Defense Attorneys
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the court and several legal offices.
|
|
|
Location of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C.
|
Relationships (2)
Maxwell's files/transcripts were in the possession of this entity, and she sued them (or vice versa) in civil court.
Judge Sweet presided over the civil case and ordered the return/destruction of confidential information.
Key Quotes (4)
"The subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment because it was overbroad and because it effected a warrantless search and seizure of material in which Maxwell had a reasonable expectation of privacy."Source
EFTA00015303.pdf
Quote #1
"The government may not . . . simply by picking up the telephone or writing a letter to the court . . . insinuate itself into a private civil lawsuit between others."Source
EFTA00015303.pdf
Quote #2
"Maxwell had a legitimate expectation of privacy in her [redacted] because she reasonably sought to preserve them as private."Source
EFTA00015303.pdf
Quote #3
"The subpoena to [redacted] was unconstitutionally overbroad, and this Court should suppress all evidence produced in response."Source
EFTA00015303.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document