DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
768 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
5
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court opinion
File Size:
768 KB
Summary
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on December 2, 2024. It argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was limited solely to the Southern District of Florida and does not prevent the USAO-SDNY from prosecuting Ghislaine Maxwell. The text cites the 'Annabi' precedent to support the conclusion that the agreement does not bind other districts.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Argument regarding whether the NPA bars her prosecution; referenced as 'Maxwell'.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Sex Offender |
Referenced regarding his obligations under the original NPA.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAO-SDNY |
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York; prosecuting body.
|
|
| Southern District of Florida |
Jurisdiction where the original NPA was negotiated and limited to.
|
|
| Federal Bureau of Investigation |
Mentioned in the text of the NPA quote regarding the joint investigation.
|
|
| United States Attorney’s Office |
Mentioned in the text of the NPA quote.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Second Circuit Court of Appeals, referenced in footnotes and as 'this Circuit'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unknown (Past)
Execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
Southern District of Florida
Jeffrey Epstein
USAO Southern District of Florida
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location limited by the NPA.
|
|
|
Location of current prosecution (implied by USAO-SDNY).
|
|
|
Referenced in case citation (Prisco).
|
|
|
Referenced in case citation (Gonzalez).
|
Relationships (2)
Maxwell attempting to use Epstein's NPA for her own defense.
Prosecution vs Defendant.
Key Quotes (4)
"Applying Annabi, we conclude that the NPA did not bar Maxwell’s prosecution by USAO-SDNY."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
Quote #1
"There is nothing in the NPA that affirmatively shows that the NPA was intended to bind multiple districts."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
Quote #2
"Instead, where the NPA is not silent, the agreement’s scope is expressly limited to the Southern District of Florida."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
Quote #3
"After timely fulfilling all the terms and conditions of the Agreement, no prosecution for the offenses set out on pages 1 and 2 of this Agreement..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014860.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document