DOJ-OGR-00001813.jpg
1.15 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court document)
File Size:
1.15 MB
Summary
This document is Page 2 of a Government filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on October 30, 2020. It addresses delays in electronic discovery production due to vendor volume and refutes defense accusations regarding the definition of the 'Prosecution Team' and the withholding of exculpatory material. A significant footnote (Footnote 2) argues that the 'genesis' of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Southern District of Florida is irrelevant because the current defendant (Maxwell) was not a party to it, was not named in it, and the agreement covered a different time period.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of prior investigation |
Mentioned in Footnote 2 regarding the non-prosecution agreement with the Southern District of Florida.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell (based on case number 1:20-cr-00330). The text argues she was not a party to the Epst...
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
The party filing the document, managing discovery production.
|
| Outside Vendor | Service Provider |
Responsible for imaging, stamping, and downloading electronic discovery.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI |
Mentioned regarding files from the prior Florida investigation.
|
|
| United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida |
Party to the non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
| The Court |
The judicial body presiding over the case (SDNY).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp).
|
Timeline (3 events)
Prior to 2020
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of prior FBI investigation and the Southern District US Attorney's Office.
|
Relationships (2)
Non-prosecution agreement mentioned in Footnote 2.
Government notes the defendant was not named in Epstein's NPA but defense claims NPA genesis is exculpatory.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Government has always viewed FBI files from both the prior Florida investigation and the more [cut off]"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001813.jpg
Quote #1
"the defense now contends that evidence about the 'genesis' of the non-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein, is exculpatory."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001813.jpg
Quote #2
"neither this Office nor the defendant were party to that agreement, the agreement covered conduct spanning a different period of time than that charged in this case, and the agreement does not mention the defendant by name."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001813.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document