DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg

969 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Department of justice opr (office of professional responsibility) report / legal filing
File Size: 969 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal conflicts and decision-making process regarding Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal in mid-2007. It highlights prosecutor Villafaña's concerns about unauthorized communications between her superiors (Menchel/Lourie) and Epstein's defense team, specifically regarding a state-based plea deal. The text outlines U.S. Attorney Acosta's reasoning for pursuing a state resolution rather than federal charges, citing concerns about victim testimony and legal issues, despite believing the victims' accounts. Footnotes clarify the specifics of the Ashcroft Memo and disputes between Acosta and Sloman regarding who was involved in the decision-making.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Villafaña Prosecutor/AUSA
Concerned about back-channel communications with defense; intended to recommend federal conspiracy charge concurrent ...
Menchel DOJ Official/Prosecutor
Had direct contact with defense counsel; proposed state plea with jail time to Sanchez; stated he acted with Acosta's...
Lourie DOJ Official
Mentioned as having been in direct contact with defense counsel.
Sanchez Defense Attorney (Epstein)
Rejected the initial state plea proposal as a 'non-starter'.
Alexander Acosta U.S. Attorney
Made the decision to pursue a state-based resolution; expressed concerns about victim testimony and legal issues.
Sloman Senior Team Member
Allegedly involved in discussions about victim credibility; in footnotes, denies involvement in decision-making.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Subject of the investigation and plea negotiations.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
OPR
Office of Professional Responsibility; conducting the investigation/interviews regarding the handling of the Epstein ...
USAO
United States Attorney's Office; investigating federal charges.

Timeline (2 events)

June 26, 2007
Meeting referenced in emails where Acosta was still deciding on the case strategy.
Unknown
Acosta Menchel
Post-2007
OPR Interviews conducting a retrospective review of the case handling.
Unknown
Acosta Menchel Sloman Villafaña OPR Investigators

Relationships (3)

Menchel Subordinate/Supervisor Acosta
Menchel explained that he would not have made the proposal to Sanchez without Acosta’s knowledge.
Villafaña Colleagues (Conflict) Menchel
Villafaña suspected communications with defense; Menchel admitted to having discussions Villafaña was wary of.
Acosta Senior Team Sloman
Acosta recalled discussions with Sloman; Sloman denies involvement in the specific resolution decision.

Key Quotes (6)

"a state plea [with] jail time and sex offender status may satisfy the [U.S. Attorney]"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg
Quote #1
"was a non-starter for them"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg
Quote #2
"believed the victims"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg
Quote #3
"believed [Epstein] did what he did"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg
Quote #4
"about some of the legal issues . . . and some of the issues in terms of testimony."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg
Quote #5
"If you would like to discuss the possibility of a federal resolution . . . that could run concurrently with any state resolution, please leave a message on my voicemail."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021237.jpg
Quote #6

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document