048.pdf
202 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal motion
File Size:
202 KB
Summary
This document is a legal motion filed on June 9, 2009, by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101 requesting an extension of time and page limits to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss. The request is based on an upcoming court hearing scheduled for June 12, 2009, in a related case (Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein) which addresses potential breaches of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The document includes certificates of conference and service, listing legal counsel for both parties, including Bruce Reinhart as counsel for a co-defendant named Sarah.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 101 | Plaintiff |
Party filing the motion for enlargement of time
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the civil action
|
| Jane Doe No. 2 | Plaintiff (Related Case) |
Plaintiff in related case No. 09-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
|
| Robert C. Josefsberg | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101
|
| Katherine W. Ezell | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 101
|
| Robert Critton | Attorney |
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Attorney listed on service list
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart | Attorney |
Attorney listed on service list, Counsel for Co-Defendant Sarah
|
| Sarah | Co-Defendant |
Mentioned as 'Co-Defendant, Sarah' in service list (likely Sarah Kellen)
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed
|
|
| Podhurst Orseck, P.A. |
Law firm representing the Plaintiff
|
|
| Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP |
Law firm representing the Defendant
|
|
| Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Law firm listed on service list
|
|
| Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. |
Law firm listed on service list
|
Timeline (4 events)
2009-05-01
2009-05-26
Defendant filed Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint
Southern District of Florida
2009-06-09
2009-06-12
Scheduled hearing for all cases consolidated for discovery under Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein
Southern District of Florida
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
|
|
Location of defense attorneys' offices
|
|
|
Address for Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
|
|
|
Address for Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP
|
|
|
Address for Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. and Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
|
Relationships (4)
Listed as Attorney for Plaintiff
Listed as Attorney for Plaintiff
Listed as Counsel for Defendant
Listed as Counsel for Co-Defendant, Sarah
Key Quotes (2)
"Defendant's seeking to stay/continue all civil cases pending against him and the Court's own inquiry as to whether the Defendant is in breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the Defendant and the United States."Source
048.pdf
Quote #1
"It would be a waste of the time of the undersigned attorneys to prepare a response to the Motion to Dismiss... when the response may be made obsolete, irrelevant or incomplete on the very day it is due as the result of matters to be discussed at the hearing on June 12th."Source
048.pdf
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document