📧 Communication
court dialogueCommunication Details
From
MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COMEY, THE COURT
Linked to MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COMEY, THE COURT
To
THE COURT, MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COMEY
Comey
Date
August 10, 2022
Subject
Responsiveness of testimony to a jury note
Message Content
Attorneys Pagliuca and Comey debate whether Special Agent Jason Richards' testimony should be added to the court's response to a jury note concerning the cross-examination of Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request.
📄 Source Document
DOJ-OGR-00017285.jpg
DOJ Collection
Document Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey. They are debating whether the testimony of Special Agent Jason Richards is a relevant response to a jury note concerning an FBI deposition and the cross-examination of a person named Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request to include the testimony but agrees to redact the jury foreperson's name from the notes before making them public.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein communication