MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COMEY, THE COURT

Person
Mentions
0
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
0

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.
No documents found for this entity.
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
4
As Recipient
2
Total
6

Responsiveness of testimony to a jury note

From: MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COME...
To: Comey

Attorneys Pagliuca and Comey debate whether Special Agent Jason Richards' testimony should be added to the court's response to a jury note concerning the cross-examination of Carolyn. The Court ultimately overrules the request.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10

Inconsistencies in witness testimony

From: MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COME...
To: ["THE COURT", "MR. PAG...

A discussion between two attorneys and a judge regarding inconsistencies in a witness's (Carolyn's) testimony about payment timeframes from Mr. Epstein and the nature of alleged encounters (sexual contact vs. being seen naked).

Court testimony
2022-08-10

Introduction of redacted flight logs (Exhibit 662-R) as e...

From: MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COME...
To: MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COME...

Attorneys Pagliuca and Comey discuss with the judge the submission of a new, more narrowly redacted version of flight logs (Exhibit 662-R), which will replace a previously offered version. They agree to mark the new exhibit as 662-RR for clarity.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10

Pre-trial procedural matters

From: MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COME...
To: MR. PAGLIUCA, MS. COME...

A discussion between the judge and two attorneys. The judge rules that an attorney cannot be called as a witness without prior briefing. The parties also discuss the timing and language of jury instructions for witnesses who will be testifying under pseudonyms.

Court hearing
2021-12-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity