HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
1.57 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal transcript (rough draft)
File Size:
1.57 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a legal proceeding or interview. The speaker describes the procedural history of a 2007/2008 legal challenge (Case 9:08-CV-80736) aimed at invalidating the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the NPA provided immunity not just to Epstein, but to 'four named women' and other potential co-conspirators regarding federal sex crimes involving minors.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Non-Prosecution Agreement |
Granted immunity via an agreement with the U.S. Government for sexually abusing minors.
|
| Mr. Edwards | Attorney/Petitioner |
Filed a petition alongside the speaker to access and invalidate the non-prosecution agreement.
|
| Speaker (Unknown) | Attorney/Witness |
Describing the legal procedural history of challenging the NPA; refers to filing actions with Mr. Edwards.
|
| Four named women | Immunity Recipients |
Specific individuals granted immunity alongside Epstein in the NPA.
|
| Potential co-conspirators | Immunity Recipients |
Unnamed individuals granted broad immunity for sexually abusing minors.
|
| Clerk | Court Official |
Refused to set an emergency hearing initially.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Government |
Entered into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein.
|
|
| District Court |
Where the petition and subsequent civil case were filed.
|
|
| House Oversight |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2007
2008 (implied by case number)
Prior to 2007 filing
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Venue for legal filing (specific location not named, but implies Federal District Court).
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Edwards and a couple days later I, we filed
nonprosecution agreement that had been entered into between the U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein
Key Quotes (4)
"giving immunity to Epstein, four named women, and any other potential co-conspirators for sexually abusing minors over an extended period of time."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
Quote #1
"seeking to invalidate that agreement, which essentially, gave immunity to at least five and potentially, you know, many more persons from federal prosecution for federal sex crimes."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
Quote #2
"the ultimate aim of the action is to try to invalidate a nonprosecution agreement and allow criminal prosecution."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
Quote #3
"The caption that we see reflected here, it's 9:08-CV-80736, and it's a civil case."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,391 characters)
47
1 action was filed back in 2007 at a time when
2 Mr. Edwards, and a couple days later, I did not know
3 that there was a nonprosecution agreement that had been
4 entered into between the U.S. Government and Jeffrey
5 Epstein giving immunity to Epstein, four named women,
6 and any other potential co-conspirators for sexually
7 abusing minors over an extended period of time.
8 And Mr. Edwards and a couple days later I, we
9 filed -- it was a petition seeking to get access to the
10 nonprosecution agreement and also seeking to invalidate
11 that agreement, which essentially, gave immunity to at
12 least five and potentially, you know, many more persons
13 from federal prosecution for federal sex crimes.
14 When the pleading was filed in the District
15 Court, what happened I believe was that the -- you know,
16 it was styled as a petition and the clerk refused to set
17 set an emergency hearing so I think there's a
18 hand-scrawled notation that it's an emergency hearing.
19 And at that point it went into the court and
20 I believe the court gave it a civil caption. The
21 caption that we see reflected here, it's 9:08-CV-80736,
22 and it's a civil case. However the ultimate aim of the
23 action is to try to invalidate a nonprosecution
24 agreement and allow criminal prosecution.
25 Now, our position, as I understand it, and as
2 Mr. Edwards, and a couple days later, I did not know
3 that there was a nonprosecution agreement that had been
4 entered into between the U.S. Government and Jeffrey
5 Epstein giving immunity to Epstein, four named women,
6 and any other potential co-conspirators for sexually
7 abusing minors over an extended period of time.
8 And Mr. Edwards and a couple days later I, we
9 filed -- it was a petition seeking to get access to the
10 nonprosecution agreement and also seeking to invalidate
11 that agreement, which essentially, gave immunity to at
12 least five and potentially, you know, many more persons
13 from federal prosecution for federal sex crimes.
14 When the pleading was filed in the District
15 Court, what happened I believe was that the -- you know,
16 it was styled as a petition and the clerk refused to set
17 set an emergency hearing so I think there's a
18 hand-scrawled notation that it's an emergency hearing.
19 And at that point it went into the court and
20 I believe the court gave it a civil caption. The
21 caption that we see reflected here, it's 9:08-CV-80736,
22 and it's a civil case. However the ultimate aim of the
23 action is to try to invalidate a nonprosecution
24 agreement and allow criminal prosecution.
25 Now, our position, as I understand it, and as
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021870
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document