023.pdf
63.3 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order (final order of dismissal)
File Size:
63.3 KB
Summary
This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on May 19, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309) in the Southern District of Florida. The order dismisses the case following a stipulation by the parties and notes that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe No. 103 | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in the civil lawsuit
|
| Kenneth A. Marra | United States District Judge |
Judge who signed the dismissal order
|
| Johnson | Judge/Magistrate |
Referenced in Case No. (likely Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson)
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case was filed
|
Timeline (1 events)
2010-05-19
Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued, closing the case following a settlement.
West Palm Beach, Florida
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the judge's chambers where the order was signed
|
Relationships (1)
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case No. 10-CV-80309
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (962 characters)
Case 9:10-cv-80309-KAM Document 23 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2010 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 10-CV-80309-MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE NO. 103,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
______________________________/
______________________________/
FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties’ Stipulation Of
Dismissal With Prejudice [DE 22]. Having considered the submission, and
being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
Dismissal With Prejudice [DE 22]. Having considered the submission, and
being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Cause be, and the same is,
hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Any pending
motions are denied as moot. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the
terms of the parties’ settlement. This case is CLOSED.
hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Any pending
motions are denied as moot. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the
terms of the parties’ settlement. This case is CLOSED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this
19th day of May, 2010.
19th day of May, 2010.
[Signature]
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
KENNETH A. MARRA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
All counsel of record
All counsel of record
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document