HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753.jpg

1.9 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal research / law review article
File Size: 1.9 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 39 of 52 in the exhibit), stamped with a House Oversight Bates number and the name David Schoen. It outlines Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding sentencing hearings, specifically focusing on the handling of objections to presentence reports and the rights of victims to be heard and participate in the process. The text emphasizes that victims have rights independent of the government or the defendant.

People (2)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Attorney
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating possession or submission of the document.
Sen. Kyl Senator
Cited in footnote 273 regarding a statement in the Congressional Record.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
B.Y.U.L. Rev.
Brigham Young University Law Review, source of the text (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
Bureau of Prisons
Mentioned in section (3)(C) regarding receiving copies of presentence reports.
Congress
Mentioned in 'The Rationale' section regarding legislative intent for victims' rights.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753'.

Timeline (1 events)

April 22, 2004
Statement by Sen. Kyl in the Congressional Record
Congress

Relationships (1)

David Schoen Legal Representation Jeffrey Epstein
David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer) is listed on the document footer, suggesting this legal research regarding sentencing and victims' rights was part of his files.

Key Quotes (3)

"The victim's right to be 'reasonably heard' at a sentencing hearing encompasses the right to be heard on Sentencing Guidelines issues."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753.jpg
Quote #1
"Congress [*903] intended that the victim become a participant in the process with rights 'independent of the Government or the defendant.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753.jpg
Quote #2
"The attorney for the government or for the victim shall advise defense counsel and the court of any ground identified by the victim that might reasonably serve as a basis for departure."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,310 characters)

Page 39 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *901
(2) Serving Objections. An objecting party must provide a copy of its objections to the opposing party and to the probation officer.
(3) Action on Objections. After receiving objections, the probation officer may meet with the parties and the victim to discuss the objections. The probation officer may then investigate further and revise the presentence report as appropriate.
. . . .
(h) Notice of Possible Departure from Sentencing Guidelines. Before the court may depart from the applicable sentencing range on a ground not identified for departure either in the presentence report or in a party's prehearing submission or in a victim impact statement, the court must give the parties reasonable notice that it is contemplating such a departure. The notice must specify any ground on which the court is contemplating a departure. The attorney for the government or for the victim shall advise defense counsel and the court of any ground identified by the victim that might reasonably serve as a basis for departure.
(i) Sentencing.
[*902]
(1) In General. At sentencing, the court:
(A) must verify that the defendant and the defendant's attorney have read and discussed the presentence report and any addendum to the report;
(B) must give to the defendant and an attorney for the government a written summary of - or summarize in camera - any information excluded from the presentence report under Rule 32(d)(3) on which the court will rely in sentencing, and give them a reasonable opportunity to comment on that information;
(C) must allow the parties' attorneys and any victims to comment on the probation officer's determinations and other matters relating to an appropriate sentence; and
(D) may, for good cause, allow a party or any victim to make a new objection at any time before sentence is imposed.
(2) Introducing Evidence; Producing a Statement. The court may permit the parties or the victim to introduce evidence on the objections. If a witness testifies at sentencing, Rule 26.2(a)-(d) and (f) applies. If a party fails to comply with a Rule 26.2 order to produce a witness's statement, the court must not consider that witness's testimony.
(3) Court Determinations. At sentencing, the court:
(A) may accept any undisputed portion of the presentence report as a finding of fact;
(B) must - for any disputed portion of the presentence report or other controverted matter - rule on the dispute or determine that a ruling is unnecessary either because the matter will not affect sentencing, or because the court will not consider the matter in sentencing; and
(C) must append a copy of the court's determinations under this rule to any copy of the presentence report made available to the Bureau of Prisons.
The Rationale:
For the reasons explained in the preceding section, the victim's right to be "reasonably heard" at a sentencing hearing encompasses the right to be heard on Sentencing Guidelines issues. Congress [*903] intended that the victim become a participant in the process with rights "independent of the Government or the defendant." 273 Those independent rights include
________________________________
273 150 Cong. Rec. S4268 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl).
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017753

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document