DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg

1.02 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
4
Relationships
9
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.02 MB
Summary

This legal document details prosecutor Villafaña's statements to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) regarding a non-prosecution provision for co-conspirators in Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Villafaña explains her rationale for including the provision, her communications with her supervisor Lourie, and her belief at the time that it would only protect Epstein's four female assistants, not any of his influential associates. The document suggests a lack of substantive discussion among prosecutors about the provision's potential implications.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Villafaña
A key figure, likely a prosecutor, who was interviewed by OPR about her role in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) inv...
Lourie Immediate supervisor to Villafaña, manager of the West Palm Beach office
Communicated with Villafaña via email about the draft NPA and was later interviewed by OPR.
Epstein Subject of an investigation and NPA
The central figure whose NPA is being discussed. The provision in question related to his potential co-conspirators.
Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned by full name in a footnote, identified as the sole abuser by victims according to Villafaña.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
OPR government agency
The entity (Office of Professional Responsibility) that conducted the interviews with Villafaña and Lourie.
West Palm Beach office government agency
The office where Lourie was a manager and which was involved in the Epstein case.
Department’s Criminal Division government agency
The division where Lourie was transitioning to a detail at the time of the NPA discussions.
USAO government agency
Mentioned in footnotes as the U.S. Attorney's Office, whose investigation focused on Epstein.
FBI government agency
Mentioned in footnotes as having interviewed a victim and learned about the activities of one of Epstein's assistants.

Timeline (5 events)

2006
Epstein's arrest, which generated press coverage.
2007
According to Villafaña, in 2007 investigators did not have specific evidence against Epstein's close female friend.
Epstein Epstein's female friend investigators
Villafaña was interviewed by OPR regarding the NPA provision for co-conspirators.
Lourie was interviewed by OPR regarding the NPA provision.
Drafting and discussion of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically a provision not to prosecute co-conspirators.
Villafaña Lourie Epstein's defense counsel

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of the office managed by Lourie.
Mentioned in a footnote as the location where certain conduct involving Epstein's female friend did not occur.

Relationships (4)

Villafaña professional Lourie
Lourie was Villafaña’s immediate supervisor. Villafaña sent him an email about the draft NPA for his input.
Villafaña professional (adversarial) Epstein
Villafaña was involved in the government's case against Epstein and the negotiation of his NPA.
Epstein personal unnamed female friend (socialite)
The document describes Epstein's 'longtime relationship with a close female friend who was a well-known socialite.'
Epstein professional (employer-employee) four female assistants
The document identifies four of Epstein's female assistants as the intended beneficiaries of the non-prosecution provision.

Key Quotes (9)

"[a]ny other thoughts,"
Source
— Villafaña (In an email to Lourie about the draft NPA, asking for his input.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #1
"doesn’t hurt us,"
Source
— Villafaña (Her observation in an email to supervisors about the non-prosecution provision.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #2
"any potential co-conspirators,"
Source
— Unknown (The text of the provision in the NPA agreeing not to prosecute certain individuals.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #3
"to make sure that he’s the only one who takes the blame for what happened."
Source
— Epstein's defense counsel (What defense counsel told Villafaña that Epstein wanted.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #4
"dirty little secret."
Source
— Villafaña (Describing her and her colleagues' belief that Epstein's conduct was his own.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #5
"didn’t have any specific evidence against her."
Source
— Villafaña (Referring to Epstein's close female friend in 2007.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #6
"co-conspirators"
Source
— Unknown (Term used to describe Epstein's four female assistants who would benefit from the NPA provision.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #7
"potential co-conspirators"
Source
— Unknown (A reference in the NPA that Villafaña did not think would be used to protect Epstein's influential associates.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #8
"none of . . . the victims that we spoke with ever talked about any other men being involved in abusing them. It was only Jeffrey Epstein."
Source
— Villafaña (A statement made to OPR, as recorded in a footnote.)
DOJ-OGR-00021367.jpg
Quote #9

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,081 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 77, 06/29/2023, 3536038, Page195 of 258
SA-193
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 193 of 348
Villafaña had raised (defense counsel’s attempt to insert an immigration waiver into the agreement), but Lourie did not comment on the provision promising not to prosecute co-conspirators or ask Villafaña to explain why she believed the provision did not harm the government’s interests. In a subsequent email about the draft NPA, Villafaña asked Lourie for “[a]ny other thoughts,” but there is no indication that he provided further input. OPR found no document that suggested Villafaña and Lourie discussed the provision further, or that the other individuals who were copied on Villafaña’s email referencing the provision—her immediate supervisor, the supervisor designated to succeed Lourie as manager of the West Palm Beach office, and Villafaña’s co-counsel—commented on or had substantive discussions about it. Villafaña told OPR that because none of the three supervisors responded to her observation that the non-prosecution provision “doesn’t hurt us,” Villafaña assumed that they agreed with her assessment.
Villafaña told OPR that she could not recall a conversation specifically about the provision agreeing not to prosecute “any potential co-conspirators,” but she remembered generally that defense counsel told her Epstein wanted “to make sure that he’s the only one who takes the blame for what happened.” Villafaña told OPR that she and her colleagues believed Epstein’s conduct was his own “dirty little secret.” Villafaña said that press coverage at the time of Epstein’s 2006 arrest did not allege that any of his famous contacts participated in Epstein’s illicit activity and that none of the victims interviewed by the case agents before the NPA was signed told the investigators about sexual activity with any of Epstein’s well-known contacts about whom allegations arose many years later.238 Villafaña acknowledged that investigators were aware of Epstein’s longtime relationship with a close female friend who was a well-known socialite, but, according to Villafaña, in 2007, they “didn’t have any specific evidence against her.”239 Accordingly, Villafaña believed that the only “co-conspirators” of Epstein who would benefit from the provision were the four female assistants identified by name.240 Villafaña also told OPR that the focus of the USAO’s investigation was Epstein, and the office was not inclined to prosecute his four assistants if he entered a plea.241 Because Villafaña was unaware of anyone else who could or would be charged, she perceived no reason to object to a provision promising not to prosecute other, unspecified “co-conspirators.” Villafaña told OPR that given her understanding of the facts at that time, it did not occur to her that the reference to other “potential co-conspirators” might be used to protect any of Epstein’s influential associates.
Lourie, who was transitioning to his detail at the Department’s Criminal Division at the time Villafaña forwarded to him the draft NPA containing the non-prosecution provision, told OPR that he did not know how the provision developed and did not recall any discussions about it.
238 Villafaña told OPR that “none of . . . the victims that we spoke with ever talked about any other men being involved in abusing them. It was only Jeffrey Epstein.”
239 The FBI had interviewed one victim who implicated the female friend in Epstein’s conduct, but the conduct involving the then minor did not occur in Florida.
240 The FBI had learned that one of Epstein’s female assistants had engaged in sexual activity with at least one girl in Epstein’s presence; this assistant was one of the named individuals for whom the defense sought the government’s agreement not to prosecute from the outset. Villafaña explained to OPR that this individual was herself believed to also have been at one time a victim.
241 Villafaña told OPR that the USAO had decided that girls who recruited other girls would not be prosecuted.
167
DOJ-OGR-00021367

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document