This document is an email chain from August 2009 regarding the 'Jane Doe' case, involving the law firm Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman. The correspondence discusses scheduling conflicts between a proposed hearing on August 20th and a pre-existing deposition. Additionally, a paralegal is seeking contact information for a 'Dr. Rishard' and the 'Office of Palm Beach Doctors' mentioned by a person identified as 'LM', noting that they have been unable to locate either entity.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert D. Critton Jr. | Attorney |
Cc'd on emails regarding Jane Doe case
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Attorney |
Cc'd on email regarding LM's responses and Dr. Rishard
|
| LM | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned in email body as providing responses mentioning a doctor
|
| Dr. Rishard | Medical Professional (Alleged) |
Doctor mentioned by LM; paralegal is unable to locate this person or their office
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff/Subject |
Subject line of the email chain
|
| Unknown Paralegal | Certified Paralegal |
Sender of the emails from Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman requesting info
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP |
Law firm representing one of the parties, employer of the paralegal
|
|
| Office of Palm Beach Doctors |
Name of a medical office the paralegal is searching for but cannot find
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
Address of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP
|
"A hearing for what?? We have a depositon set that morning so I need to know what it is for??"Source
"in briefly reviewing LM's responses, she mentions a Dr. Rishard."Source
"I have looked for an 'Office of Palm Beach Doctors' and and a 'Dr. Rishard' and have been unable to locate either."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,414 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document