This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between defense attorney Michael Bachner and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence discusses scheduling a 'reverse proffer' meeting and addresses a Grand Jury subpoena for Bachner's client, who intends to invoke their Fifth Amendment privilege. The prosecution (SDNY) challenges the blanket invocation of the Fifth Amendment and shares the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and a blank proffer agreement with the defense.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Bachner | Defense Attorney |
Representing a witness/subject in the Epstein investigation; communicating with the US Attorney's office regarding su...
|
| [Redacted] (AUSA) | Assistant United States Attorney |
Prosecutor for the Southern District of New York (SDNY); coordinating with Bachner regarding his client's potential t...
|
| [Redacted] (Client) | Witness/Subject |
Client of Michael Bachner; subpoenaed for Grand Jury; likely to invoke 5th Amendment privilege; lives in a redacted l...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned in the email subject line 'Epstein investigation' and attachment 'Epstein NPA, dated 2007-09-24.pdf'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bachner & Associates, PC |
Law firm representing the witness.
|
|
| FBI |
Federal Bureau of Investigation; recipients in the email chain (NY Field Office).
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York (US Attorney's Office); prosecuting authority.
|
|
| American College of Trial Lawyers (ACTL) |
Linked in Michael Bachner's email signature.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Office of Bachner & Associates, PC.
|
|
|
Office of the Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY).
|
|
|
Location of a witness interview mentioned by an email participant; also mentioned regarding previous civil proceedings.
|
|
|
Residence of Michael Bachner's client.
|
"Regarding the subpoena to testify before the Grand Jury on [Redacted], we hereby notify you that if called as a witness [Redacted] would invoke her Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination."Source
"Would 7/16 at around 6pm work for the reverse proffer in our office at 1 St. Andrews?"Source
"That likely will affect our determination regarding the grand jury appearance, at which we would expect, were we to call [Redacted] to ask her a number of questions we would expect to argue to the court do not implicate a fifth amendment privilege—i.e., that she couldn't simply blanket invoke."Source
"attached are the non-prosecution agreement, previously publicly filed in civil proceedings in Florida, and a blank version of our standard proffer agreement"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (7,390 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document